[Ghostinthehouse]

As BB are allowing HMs to discuss nominations this could give HMs the first real chance they have to rig who wins and share the prize money among their friends who are all in the final 2-4 HMs who help them win.

One thing about discussing nominations that BB don't seem to have considered is that if several housemate decide to fix it so they are the final 2, 3 0r 4 HMs they could arrange to split the prize money. After all £25,000 is still a lot of money! They could of course do that anyway but it would be much more guess work than fixing it if they couldn't discuss the nominations. Discussing the nominations could led to HMs colluding over sharing the final prize money.

[BJ]

That's a very good point

[Braden]

yes,but what kind of game would big brother be if the housemates got to choose who got the money. i like it when only one housemate gets the money , like in other series when numerous people get money like bb6, bb9 etc

[Ghostinthehouse]

Originally posted by BradenMaccie
yes,but what kind of game would big brother be if the housemates got to choose who got the money. i like it when only one housemate gets the money , like in other series when numerous people get money like bb6, bb9 etc

You're missing the point. I'm not saying BB should share the prize money between HMs. I'm saying the HMs may break the rules by fixing nominations to enable them to share the prize money with their friends in the house. And that could be done as they are discussing nominations.

[Striptease]

But do you think Charlie wants to share the money ? I don't think so.

[BB_Eye]

What is this? Communist Big Brother?