| FAQ | 
| Members List | 
| Calendar | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
|  |  | 
| International Big Brother Big Brother around the world! | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  01-09-2009, 06:44 AM | #1 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Cyber Warrior | 
			
			Channel 4 are contractually obligated to do BB11, but as they have decided to drop Big Brother, is there a way they could pay Endemol off and not do BB11? I was wondering if there are any C4 execs wondering about that possibility   | |||
|   | 
|  01-09-2009, 05:33 PM | #3 | ||
| 
 | |||
| Senior Member | 
			
			It would cost more than its worth. They might as well go ahead with a series they've already paid for rather than waste £60m, then pay off a contract with money they don't have, then commission another 93 hours worth of programming starting in 9 months time | ||
|   | 
|  01-09-2009, 07:21 PM | #4 | ||
| 
 | |||
| Senior Member | 
			
			It's obvious there is no get out clause because they would have used it if their was.    It won't happen now, but the only way I could have seen out of it is if C4 still agreed to pay Endemol £60m for content that wasn't Big Brother, which actually could have benefited Endemol too. Personally I think Endemol might have been wise to try and renegotiate the contract so rather than £60m for one series and one celeb series, C4 paid £60m over two years for just two regular summer series, cut down to around 10-11 weeks each - with Endemol committed to revamping the show. That would bring in BB cheaper for C4, and could have worked out for Endemol too by giving the show a fighting chance of finding it's feet again, which I'm sure with MAJOR - and I mean MAJOR - change it could have done. | ||
|   | 
|  01-09-2009, 10:00 PM | #5 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| IntoxiKated | 
			
			[rquote=2513430&tid=145024&author=Brekkie]It's obvious there is no get out clause because they would have used it if their was.    It won't happen now, but the only way I could have seen out of it is if C4 still agreed to pay Endemol £60m for content that wasn't Big Brother, which actually could have benefited Endemol too. Personally I think Endemol might have been wise to try and renegotiate the contract so rather than £60m for one series and one celeb series, C4 paid £60m over two years for just two regular summer series, cut down to around 10-11 weeks each - with Endemol committed to revamping the show. That would bring in BB cheaper for C4, and could have worked out for Endemol too by giving the show a fighting chance of finding it's feet again, which I'm sure with MAJOR - and I mean MAJOR - change it could have done.[/rquote] my god, a PERSON WHO TALKS SENSE! BB producers take heed,why the hell didn't u come up with this solution, and the show wouldn't have gone down the tubes, all us fans are gutted, n summer ain't summer without bb.cmon,its not too late. | |||
|   | 
|  01-09-2009, 10:29 PM | #6 | ||
| 
 | |||
| Senior Member | 
			
			[rquote=2513430&tid=145024&author=Brekkie]It's obvious there is no get out clause because they would have used it if their was.    It won't happen now, but the only way I could have seen out of it is if C4 still agreed to pay Endemol £60m for content that wasn't Big Brother, which actually could have benefited Endemol too. Personally I think Endemol might have been wise to try and renegotiate the contract so rather than £60m for one series and one celeb series, C4 paid £60m over two years for just two regular summer series, cut down to around 10-11 weeks each - with Endemol committed to revamping the show. That would bring in BB cheaper for C4, and could have worked out for Endemol too by giving the show a fighting chance of finding it's feet again, which I'm sure with MAJOR - and I mean MAJOR - change it could have done.[/rquote] How would 2 11 week series' at £60m be cheaper than 3 summer series' and January series' at £180 altogether? | ||
|   | 
|  05-09-2009, 02:49 PM | #7 | ||
| 
 | |||
| Senior Member | 
			
			[rquote=2515445&tid=145024&author=Tom] How would 2 11 week series' at £60m be cheaper than 3 summer series' and January series' at £180 altogether? [/rquote] First I'll mock your schoolboy error by saying obviously not. Secondly, two series for £60m rather than three series plus extras for £180m is obviously cheaper. C4 would pay out £30m a year rather than £60m. They lose Celeb BB and a couple of weeks off the main show, but everyone agrees the main show would benefit from that. Right back to the original question and considering this year BB cost £60m and bought in just £32m in ad revenue, there is an argument that C4 paying Endemol £30m not to have BB11 might have been value for money. | ||
|   | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
| 
 | 
 |