About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

chauncey · 03-08-2010, 01:12 AM

What happened to the punishment?
This is all BB's fault,BB is like a parent who spoils their child and never tells them off then is suprised when they grow into a bratty teenager.

If BB hadn't given JJJ special treatment from the start; doing nothing when they first turned mikes off,no punishment for JJ breaking into the camera runs, allowing them to sleep in bed all day, then JJJ wouldnt feel invincible and like they can ignore punishments.

Big Brother created this DuvetTwins monster.

Fuzzylogic · 03-08-2010, 01:17 AM

I heard them talking on live feed earlier, the conditions of the punishment was that they can not be in the same room, with the only exception being they can only be in the bedroom together, but only when they are sleeping.

Princess · 03-08-2010, 01:19 AM

The punishment is over,BB said they can be in the same room together just not sleep in the same bed and they must figure since they're not sleeping this doesn't count.

Malza · 03-08-2010, 01:20 AM

Well, we can call it a punishment FAIL then

setanta · 03-08-2010, 01:21 AM

Most of me doesn't want to make a comment here because it's quite obvious that BB are catering to their needs and I'm just completely bored by the pair of them.

chauncey · 03-08-2010, 01:23 AM

BB know who they can push and who will stamp their diva feet and threaten to leave.
If it was anyone else,BB would have given them an immediate punishment there and then like
Automatically up for eviction or something.

How come Dave was put up straight away for talking about noms ONCE ,yet the Golden Couple have ultimately had no real punishment,for repeated rule-breaking???Ridiculous.

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 01:24 AM

NO WAY, this IS a def rulebreak, they might not be in bed BUT are together on floor under the duvet again. If they think its technically not in bed and is fine BB should step in and remove one of them. This is so taking the piss, they cannot obey whatsoever. I hope the food gets taken away, no hot water, whatever, so all the others can blame them and know whom to nominate from now on. How do you like that loving Dave?

chauncey · 03-08-2010, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE WATCHER

NO WAY, this IS a def rulebreak, they might not be in bed BUT are together on floor under the duvet again. If they think its technically not in bed and is fine BB should step in and remove one of them. This is so taking the piss, they cannot obey whatsoever. I hope the food gets taken away, no hot water, whatever, so all the others can blame them and know whom to nominate from now on. How do you like that loving Dave?

It's ridiculous how much JJJ control the house,it's like all the HMs(apart from Sam)are scared of them.

I've heard one or two joke about it,but no one seriously questions all the special treatment JJJ get(that arabian date was so meant to be for them)
If I was in there,I'd be pissed off at their preferential treatment.

I don't know why I'm suprised really; BB wouldn't bring a HM all the way from Australia if they weren't determined to keep them in.What a rigged joke.

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 01:47 AM

What makes it even worse is that the other HMs know of the punishment terms but are saying nothing, are they thick? Surely they might cotton on that should the pair continue with their disobedience the whole house might get punished?. Oh I forgot, they all love each other so much they are prepared to take any punishment as long as the lovers are happy. Grrrrr

chauncey · 03-08-2010, 01:58 AM

Yeah did you hear the fools Rachel etc rushing to coo 'it was only a peck' blah blah'
1. If Rachel knew how JJJJJA had been slagging her off for being loud,doubt she would jump to their defence 2. Rachel/JJ2 types think if they stay in line,sucking up to JJJ they will be in a good postion.Wrong.Thats just makes them look like they have no backbone and allows BB to favor JJJ as much as they like because the JJ2/Rachel types are too scared to protest.

Seriously thinking of this is making me think I'm on crack; Dave automatically up for eviction because he spoke about noms ONCE,
JJ allowed to verbally attack Rachael constantly for days,admit throwing Save and Replace tasks,break into camera runs,lie in bed all day,turn off mike and ignore 'punishment'.And what happens to him?Nothing.

The favoritism this year is a complete and utter joke.And to think I thought letting Nikki back in was bad...

Princess · 03-08-2010, 02:03 AM

They're actually on the floor cos BB said they couldn't sleep in the same bed,that is SO CUTE.

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 02:08 AM

Very well put Chauncey, just noticed on LF John James getting into own bed, but its been what, 90 minutes or more of being huddled together with Josie on the floor? Perhaps they think that will not count. Same then if someone decides to leave mic off for 90 mins, saying its ok I'll put it on again soon? Producers of BB have made fools of us all and its a shame we cannot do anything about such a circus as this series.

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 02:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess

They're actually on the floor cos BB said they couldn't sleep in the same bed,that is SO CUTE.

CUTE??? Are you serious? Its a RULEBREAK

Princess · 03-08-2010, 02:10 AM

No it's not,they said same bed they never said they couldn't sleep on the floor. Anyways they're gone to seperate beds now.

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess

No it's not,they said same bed they never said they couldn't sleep on the floor. Anyways they're gone to seperate beds now.

That one won't wash, implied bed same as being together under a duvet, even if it were in garden. Still a rulebreak

Shiner · 03-08-2010, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Princess

They're actually on the floor cos BB said they couldn't sleep in the same bed,that is SO CUTE.

chauncey · 03-08-2010, 02:18 AM

Big Brother probably knew this would happen and had no intention of them being punished; they wanted the Romeo and Juliet story of them 'rushing to embrace'(bleargh) tomorrows HLs will be the same old 'John and Josie Show' urgh.

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 02:21 AM

Certainly looks that way, have they bothered to show either of them in a bad light on the HL shows? None I can recall..........sick bags at the ready

tintedshadow · 03-08-2010, 02:21 AM

damn i'd draw for my double facepalm pic for this thread but i cant be assed so eff it,im very rarely shocked by what i read on this forum,but how in gods name are there grown ass men/women complaining about two people who like each other actually being together? smh before anyone chimes in about oooh its cause they're rule breaking,so ****in what?on how many occasions do housemates break rules and its seen as endearing or just trying to liven up the show? err marcus akin anyone? err spencer?

its strange because i have nothing positive to say about josie but this new wave of hate for her and jj is unreal...

THE WATCHER · 03-08-2010, 02:26 AM

Its justified when others get punished, we do not like it when BB favors certain HMs and lets them break rules right left and centre. If one has been following every season and watched live feed for hours each day not blinded by edited HL shows one gets a sympathy/empathy for some HMs and a distinct loathing of others. Look at that nasty weasel Luke a couple years back!

chauncey · 03-08-2010, 02:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE WATCHER

Certainly looks that way, have they bothered to show either of them in a bad light on the HL shows? None I can recall..........sick bags at the ready

People are trying to say that because BB put Sam in,that proves they aren't trying to engineer a JJJ win.Rubbish.Like all storytellers BB knows you can't have a drama without the 'hero' and the 'heroine' facing obstacles.Sam was put in there to be the 'obstacle' that JJJ will 'heroically' triumph over.Yuck.

BB is really going for the Romeo and Juliet angle,the only thing that puts a spanner in the works is that I don't recall Romeo calling Juliet a 'fat arse' and 'five chins' and Juliet having to ask Romeo to say he likes her out loud and having to hold down Romeo to forcibly kiss him.

tintedshadow · 03-08-2010, 02:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by THE WATCHER

Its justified when others get punished, we do not like it when BB favors certain HMs and lets them break rules right left and centre. If one has been following every season and watched live feed for hours each day not blinded by edited HL shows one gets a sympathy/empathy for some HMs and a distinct loathing of others. Look at that nasty weasel Luke a couple years back!

lol well one thinks one should have a problem with bb and not with the housemates concerned,its like if theres a favourite in the family you dont blame the sibling if its the parents who are favouring them over another.. once more they're not the only housemates to have broken a rule neither,so the only thing this forum has a distinct loathing for is two consenting adults actually having a genuine interest in one another. as if its a crime they are attracted to one another,as if they dont enjoy one anothers company.

the most obvios cliche used in every series is saying that the relationship was tailored to fit the show's storyline,when in fact most of us would be in there and if attracted to someone im not sure how long it would be hidden for,since we're meant to "real" in there.