[abs]

for example, if grace said to lisa "i hate richard..." & lisa said "me to..." surely thats influencing votes!?! grace & mikey nominated the same people this week, & its clear grace is the man in that relationship. so why aint people getting a warning when they say something like "i hate such & such..." because the person will only agree with them, therefor being influenced! the same as last year, team saskia saying "i hate makosi..." so then everyone will nominate makosi come voting time. i reckon you should be aloud to talk about nominations because at the end of the day everyone has their on mind & reasons, & it should be more of a compitition so people actually go in there to win the price money at all costs (like the US version).

thoughts...

[bananarama]

Mmmm. Just because a person say's to another I hate so and so and the other person agrees does not automatically mean they have been influenced it means thay have an opinion that coincides with each other. So proof of influence cannot be established.

I think there is a thin line between commenting and influencing and BB should only act when it is patently obvious that an attempt to cook the books has happened.

As for being allowed to talk about nominations i am not sure..I don't like the american version of BB personally.

Maybe for one year it might not be a bad idea to try it out here in the UK......

[mupz]

They dont have to agree to hate someone! and if they say "me too" then they prob would vote for that person anyways!