About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

chuff me dizzy · 17-07-2013, 05:55 PM

It is getting crazier by the week now ,why 5 up ?? In other years its been 2 ,but this year stupid amounts of them I think its a twist to save producers blue eyed favourites

Withano · 17-07-2013, 06:01 PM

Can you imagine the backlash if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms but were put up with the top three. Its a shame nobody cares about the odd and bias sudden unexplained rule change because it benefits their favourites.

Vanessa · 17-07-2013, 06:02 PM

It's about time the twins and Jackie were put up for eviction.

chuff me dizzy · 17-07-2013, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano

Can you imagine the backlash if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms but were put up with the top three. Its a shame nobody cares about the odd and bias sudden unexplained rule change because it benefits their favourites.

Exactly ,but its just stupid ,all that many up week after week

00Jamie00 · 17-07-2013, 06:04 PM

Prefer 5 than only 2

Withano · 17-07-2013, 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

Exactly ,but its just stupid ,all that many up week after week

I'm with you on this one Chuff. There should be one rule and they should stick to it. Ridiculous decision to add the extras.

Calderyon · 17-07-2013, 06:05 PM

More nominees brings more Money. Or the fact that they want to protect someone or someones from eviction. (I still think it´s D&G)

Jordan. · 17-07-2013, 06:06 PM

Their logic is ridiculous. Instead of changing the nomination process to save big characters why not just go back to vote to save

Calderyon · 17-07-2013, 06:08 PM

Now you know how we have felt on our BB for 6 series now.

Daffodil · 17-07-2013, 06:11 PM

All I know is that Jackie Travers is up!!! Yayyy there is a God!

Vanessa · 17-07-2013, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daffodil

All I know is that Jackie Travers is up!!! Yayyy there is a God!

My feelings exactly.

RichardG · 17-07-2013, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Their logic is ridiculous. Instead of changing the nomination process to save big characters why not just go back to vote to save

Exactly. Vote to save with a minimum of three up and they're sorted.

Jake. · 17-07-2013, 06:13 PM

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

Josy · 17-07-2013, 06:14 PM

The more up the better

Shaun · 17-07-2013, 06:16 PM

It is strange. But I don't think it's going to help Dexter or Gina. If they were up against Callum, he would go. No question.

armand.kay · 17-07-2013, 06:18 PM

I would care if it didn't benefit my faves xox

Withano · 17-07-2013, 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JH95

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

But you just know that if Gina and Dexter had the 4th and 5th highest amount of noms, the thread would have been made at least 30 times..

fingers · 17-07-2013, 06:22 PM

BB have said from the very first, "BB makes the rules, BB can change the rules at any time" how very convenient.

Jake. · 17-07-2013, 06:26 PM

I'm all for this, four-way evictions>>> and you just know that this thread wouldn't have been made if Jackie was not up

chuff me dizzy · 17-07-2013, 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano

I'm with you on this one Chuff. There should be one rule and they should stick to it. Ridiculous decision to add the extras.

Just no need whatsoever for it ,apart from greed and trying to save their favs ,lets be honest here we have never been able to prove WE decide ,its all down to trust ,and this year I dont feel I can trust them