[Beastie]

I am sick of lazy housemates not doing the tasks properly which happen every year. EVERY ONE of the housemates needs to take part in the tasks. The 2 with the lowest score of each task every week is AUTOMATICALLY put up for eviction. Then from the remainder of the housemates, plus the 2 already up.. they all vote for another 2 housemates to be put up for eviction.

So at least 4 housemates will be put up for eviction.

[Mystic Mock]

That's brilliant for the early weeks as you can then turn it into a vote to save which should make sure that a dullard leaves.

[Marsh.]

They should put work in for their own portion of the shopping.

If anyone is not pulling their weight in tasks then they don't get to enjoy the shopping and are put on rations of their own.

[Samm]

I just want 2 up, I'm fed up with half the house being up

[Marsh.]

No, it's less predictable with at least 3 housemates up.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Sam <3

I just want 2 up, I'm fed up with half the house being up

No, it should be Vote to Save with 3 up.

But it should only be the top 3 people with the most nominations. Not people who are like 6th on the nominations table because they got like 2 votes.

Oh and they shouldn't reveal who got the most/least votes either, it tells the HMs who the favourites are and it loses the suspense for the viewers.

[Maxxie.]

Ffs nominations the traditional way

2 with most votes up unless it's a draw

[camertone]

excellent idea!!

[jyunga]

I liked the Aussie format better. 5 points disputed between two nominations. Top 6 house guests are up. If there's a tie for the top 6, the top vote getter is forced to pick one out of the tie to take the final nomination slot. They even segregated the nominees in a lesser area of the house after nominations until the eviction. It made for an interesting season. With the nominees segregated the other house mates not up would end up getting annoying by each other and the following week the nominations would be tossed around quite a bit with a different group of 6 going up for different reasons.

[Marsh.]

Yeah, after 15 years, the noms system has gotten dull.

They should introduce the points system to make it a little more exciting.

[BBDodge]

So long as the winner is the fittest I shan't complain.

[reece(:]

3+ up with VTS

[Jay.]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

Yeah, after 15 years, the noms system has gotten dull.

They should introduce the points system to make it a little more exciting.

i know! i hate it ;/ i usually skip it. i want them to copy bb aus ;(

[Spoon]

Originally Posted by Jay.

i know! i hate it ;/ i usually skip it. i want them to copy bb aus ;(

BB AU has the right idea; I agree. I like the points system, putting 6 people on the block until the show's almost over, and the rather wacky competitions (though the powers they award are sometimes too great).

[bez87]

Just 2 up I think they put half the house up in the recent ones each week, it sort of makes nominations mean nothing, which is just what's the point, I mean people were being put up with just 2 votes to someone who had 5, how is that even fair, even worth watching nominations for, thats how i felt in the last CBB, they voted and in the end 5 or so were up and it was pointless

[Kizzy]

Do I like this pseudo-political laissez- faire aspect to the show?.....

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Spoon

BB AU has the right idea; I agree. I like the points system, putting 6 people on the block until the show's almost over, and the rather wacky competitions (though the powers they award are sometimes too great).

I like the points system. But 6 people up is too much.

It should be the top 3 face eviction.