[Headie]

Now that Kim's gone, I think they should definitely invite back Biannca or Danielle (or Marlon but we don't need another male tbh). I also wouldn't mind it if they replaced her with another new female HM tbh.

They could get away with putting Biannca back in because no one 'evicted' her, they just saved other HMs instead.

Having only 3 girls left is a joke and there's still 7 males left... what an absolute farce.

[LukeB]

Yes danielle should go back in

[Jake.]

Bringing back Danielle would be fair given how it wasn't a 'proper' eviction

[Marc]

Money was spent for the eviction. Wasted money if Biannca is put back in as people will have frantically voted to save Pav and Zoe for nothing.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Marc

Money was spent for the eviction. Wasted money if Biannca is put back in as people will have frantically voted to save Pav and Zoe for nothing.

Bit they can get away with it, as the whole point of vote to save is to save your favourites, not evict someone else. So people who voted Pav/Zoe to get Biannca out aren't technically using the system properly, which is why she'd be allowed to come back if necessary.

[Marc]

Originally Posted by Hayden

Bit they can get away with it, as the whole point of vote to save is to save your favourites, not evict someone else. So people who voted Pav/Zoe to get Biannca out aren't technically using the system properly, which is why she'd be allowed to come back if necessary.

It's wasted money and it wouldn't be fair for those who voted.

[Headie]

Originally Posted by Cherie

She was voted out by the public where is the technicality SH?

Originally Posted by Marc

It's wasted money and it wouldn't be fair for those who voted.

She received the least votes to keep her in, so less money was spent on her.

No one voted to evict her, they voted to save someone else. So if people paid money to save Pav & Zoe, good on them because Pav & Zoe are still there, but if Biannca was to go back in, Pav & Zoe would still be there and the money would not have been wasted.

The whole point of Vote to Save isn't to get somebody out, it's to keep someone in. People should've thought about that when they were voting for Zoe/Pav.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Hayden

She received the least votes to keep her in, so less money was spent on her.

No one voted to evict her, they voted to save someone else. So if people paid money to save Pav & Zoe, good on them because Pav & Zoe are still there, but if Biannca was to go back in, Pav & Zoe would still be there and the money would not have been wasted.

The whole point of Vote to Save isn't to get somebody out, it's to keep someone in. People should've thought about that when they were voting for Zoe/Pav.

It still renders the public vote pointless if all of them stay?

That's fairly obvious.

Saying "We're going to be evicting one of the newbies so you better vote to save your favourite" then changing to "All 3 are staying in anyway so your votes are meaningless" is not going to happen.

[Daffodil]

For FAIRNESS' sake, Danielle has got to go back in.

[Lex]

Originally Posted by Daffodil

For FAIRNESS' sake, Danielle has got to go back in.

And have the power to evict just like Pav and Zoe had!

[Samm]

Yes Danielle plz, or a new HM

They brought Kinga back in with only about 2 weeks left so it's not to late

[Yaki da]

Why do people want the fraudulent Danielle back in the house?

[joeysteele]

Normally I would say no and especially to evicted housemates but after last week's farce as to evictions and noms I do think really Danielle should, if anyone ought to, now be returned if she wished to.

This series just gets worse and worse and BB have made it a near laughing stock, how Emma and Rylan on bbbots can defend this nonsense as supposed people who love BB is beyond me.

In my view Danielle was evicted by BB and no one else, it allowed people who had been in the house for less than 5 days to make the decision and for me, it was totally wrong and unacceptable too.
Whether she would want to go in again is now likely doubtful and the way BB are wrecking the noms and eviction process with really stupid ideas, would suggest to me that they would have no intention whatsoever of putting anyone back in anyway.

Thank goodness this series is over halfway through because rivetting watching and anything at all of real entertainment value,it certainly falls miles short of,in my view.
It really needs putting out of its misery.

[Pete.]

Bring back Danielle

[Gusto Brunt]

Put Sasha in!

[Jay.]

With Danielle please

[andybigbro]

No. There's too many in there.

[smudgie]

Enough people in there now.
No way should an evicted housemate be put back in.

[Livia]

She should be replaced by a housemate with equal personality and charisma. Say, a pot plant of some kind.

[Amy Jade]

Biannca should come back, technically she was not evicted.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by StupidHoe

Biannca should come back, technically she was not evicted.

Pretty sure she was

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by StupidHoe

Biannca should come back, technically she was not evicted.

She was voted out by the public where is the technicality SH?

[Northern Monkey]

I would like Bianca but for the sake of fairness it should be Danielle.Her eviction should not have taken place with Kim gone.

[JTM45]

It won't happen! No way, no how.

[PrincessIona]

No, although I'm very dissapointed Danielle and Bianca left. Bianca shouldn't go back because she was voted out, in a way I'd like Danielle back but I disagree with people being evicted then put back in. I'd be quite happy for her to go back because I quite like her but I'd be fuming if it happened with someone I didn't like so it would be kind of a double standard