[EdemMusic]

Simple, she has not had the full experience. She has not been nominated and has no idea what it feels like to face the public vote and to sit through eviction on a Friday. Pav is even more deserving than Helen is as, even though he came in late, has nominated, been nominated, been up for eviction and has been saved by the public. I cant say the same about Helen. So as she has not experienced Big Brother, she therefore cannot win Big Brother, end of story.

[JoshBB]

Originally Posted by EdemMusic

She has not been nominated

idc

Originally Posted by EdemMusic:7149763

end of story.

no its not

[EdemMusic]

Originally Posted by JoshBB

idc



no its not

She has not experienced Big Brother, how is she a better winner to others that have?

[jessicadanielle]

For me, I just think we shouldn't be rewarding the behaviour she has exhibited over the series. I've seen lots of comments that she's just a lost soul and all her bullying and aggression is a defence mechanism blah blah, but lots of people have insecurities and have had hard times but do not treat people the way that she does. Voting her to win after the stuff she's done and said would be telling her and the public that bullies win in the end.

Also, personally I don't find her having a go at everyone and being nasty very entertaining, but even if some do find her entertaining at the expense of other people's feelings, I still don't think that should be rewarded with 100k and the winner's title.

[Pete.]

She will never win in a million years tho