[EdemMusic]

Helen would not give £1000 (which was given to her in the first place) to charity even when she would have £3000 (that someone else gave to her). Why should someone of such character win Big Brother?

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by EdemMusic

Helen would not give £1000 (which was given to her in the first place) to charity even when she would have £3000 (that someone else gave to her). Why should someone of such character win Big Brother?

We don't know what she would do

[billy123]

Do you give a third of your wages to charity?

[Creggle]

Because she'd been entertaining I guess. That's what I like to think anyway, they can't like her as a person it's only fair we give her fans the benefit of the doubt.

Originally Posted by bobnot

I wouldnt give a third of my money to charity.
Do you give a third of your wages to charity?

Not the same, 8 x 3000 left them with 1000 left which they can't split equally, so Pav suggested they had may as well just give it to a charity.

[chuff me dizzy]

What she choses to spend HER money on is HER business, can you now please tell us what everyone else is going to spend it on ,or is this just a thread to attack Helen in ?

[Marsh.]

Why should it go to charity?

That was to do with the hypothetical extra 25k which they've now lost. We don't know what she'd do with 100k.

[EdemMusic]

Originally Posted by Craigy_CraigO

Because she'd been entertaining I guess. That's what I like to think anyway, they can't like her as a person it's only fair we give her fans the benefit of the doubt.



Not the same, 8 x 3000 left them with 1000 left which they can't split equally, so Pav suggested they had may as well just give it to a charity.

Being vile to other people, bullying and ridiculing them is not entertainment. If you find that entertaining then you need a good psychiatrist

[Jack_]

Who gives a crap what they do with the money? I think it's bad she made the £1k charity comment too but this show (sadly) isn't about the money and what they plan to spend it on isn't what should determine the winner, who's contributed to the show the most over the summer should

[Creggle]

Originally Posted by EdemMusic

Being vile to other people, bullying and ridiculing them is not entertainment. If you find that entertaining then you need a good psychiatrist

I don't I'm giving reasoning as to why she has fans, and trying to defend their decision.

[billy123]

Originally Posted by EdemMusic

That makes you a bad person and undeserving of winning a show like Big Brother. Why would the public vote for someone with such bad character to win? Why should i waste my money to vote for someone so stingy. Morever, the £1000 was not a third of her money, it was leftover of the divided £25,000 if they eventually won the money and the pact they made still stood.

and who the **** are you to judge me a bad person.

[EdemMusic]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

What she choses to spend HER money on is HER business, can you now please tell us what everyone else is going to spend it on ,or is this just a thread to attack Helen in ?

It wasnt HER money, the £3000 was her money, the £1000 which Pav suggested to be given to charity was leftover of the £25000 after it was divided between the eight housemates.

[Pete.]

the comment about charity was bad tho

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by EdemMusic

Helen would not give £1000 (which was given to her in the first place) to charity even when she would have £3000 (that someone else gave to her). Why should someone of such character win Big Brother?

She wouldn't give her share of the 1000 grand actually.

Which was £125. Tight cow.

[Liam-]

I wouldn't give any of my winnings, real or theoretical, to charity either, there's too many important things within my family that the money could go towards to just give it away

[Mrjrb2014]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

the comment about charity was bad tho

helen is just all bad...its cringy, people trying to find the good in her(actually seems like there is none) or make excuses for her continued vileness(entertainment) if people find her entertaining that says alot

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mrjrb2014

helen is just all bad...its cringy, people trying to find the good in her(actually seems like there is none) or make excuses for her continued vileness(entertainment) if people find her entertaining that says alot

It's "cringy" when people try to find fault with every single thing she does.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by EdemMusic

If you cannot even give leftovers to the poor and needy then that makes you a bad person

IF you had bothered to even listen ,she also said "I already give lots to charity"but you chose to not hear that part ? at the end of the day, her money, her choice

[MrWong]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

It's "cringy" when people try to find fault with every single thing she does.

Only the ***** things tbh.

[Mrjrb2014]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Only the ***** things tbh.

which she seems to do 99% of the time

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

IF you had bothered to even listen ,she also said "I already give lots to charity"but you chose to not hear that part ? at the end of the day, her money, her choice

In that moment it was about the group giving £1000 to charity not just Helen but she openly said she didn't want to

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

In that moment it was about the group giving £1000 to charity not just Helen but she openly said she didn't want to

THEN said what I said above

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MrWong

Only the ***** things tbh.

No. Every single thing she says or does is dissected to the smallest degree. More so than any other housemate.

[reece(:]

But she's using the money to foster? Which is just as good a cause.

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy

THEN said what I said above

Great but she basically shouted down the group not to give money charity all the same

[serensilver]

Who here gives a third of their wages to charity?

The people who run charities are on more money than you and me if the money was donated the needy wouldn't have got it anyway.

But if you wouldn't give a third of your wages to charity ( like what some of you think Helen should do, regardless of whether she had "earned it") You shouldn't judge really?