[T*]

due to it being vote to save would you be against say a vote to bring someone back in
the series has lost a lot of characters already so I’m interested to see what y’all think

[Nicky91]

they will lose another big character now with the backdoor twist i think

[RileyH]

I want rachel back so no

[Ellen]

Yes, left dont come back.

[Gusto Brunt]

Yes. I never liked that.

[Lilac hills]

Bringing India and Racheal in now would feel rushed and prob wouldn’t work but if it was earlier then no I wouldn’t be opposed and honestly I think it’d do this series some good

[reece(:]

Bring all three of the huns back.

[Rufus]

If it means bringing back India and Rachel no.

[waterhog]

history stands for the past - g2g - off to watch back to the future.

[Eddie.]

Im against it, when i voted, but changed my mind.

[Cherie]

The only time someone should be brought back is if there is no public vote, if a vote has taken place they need to stay gone

[Cal.]

I wouldn't waste it on this series.

I always thought Danielle and Biannca should have been reinstated in BB15 bc the public didn't vote to evict them.

[Cal.]

I wouldn't waste it on this series.

I always thought Danielle and Biannca should have been reinstated in BB15 bc the public didn't vote to evict them.

[Cal.]

I wouldn't waste it on this series.

I always thought Danielle and Biannca should have been reinstated in BB15 bc the public didn't vote to evict them.

[Morgan.]

Originally Posted by Cal.

I wouldn't waste it on this series.

I always thought Danielle and Biannca should have been reinstated in BB15 bc the public didn't vote to evict them.

Originally Posted by Cal.

I wouldn't waste it on this series.

I always thought Danielle and Biannca should have been reinstated in BB15 bc the public didn't vote to evict them.

Originally Posted by Cal.

I wouldn't waste it on this series.

I always thought Danielle and Biannca should have been reinstated in BB15 bc the public didn't vote to evict them.

Ok hun we get your point x

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by Blurryface

Ok hun we get your point x

BRING BACK SLUTTY B AND VIRGIN DANNI!!!!!!!

/phoebe pick up the sock pick up the sock PICK UP THE SOCK!

[y.winter]

I would love seeing Rachel in the house again, but if you're gone - you're gone.

[jaxie]

Yes I don't think they have anything to bring when they come back. The only time it has been good drama was when Lee Ryan was in the house, otherwise it's usually a big damp squib.

[joeysteele]

Yes,anyone voted out in vote to evict,or failing to win votes to be off the bottom as to vote to save
Are rejected housemates.

It's happened over the years to many of my initial favourites but never would I support any going back in.

[Livia]

If the public voted them out, there was a reason behind it. So no, they should stay gone.

[Vicky.]

Not when a public vote has been done. If its a housemates evict thing then yes, thats fine.

[GoldHeart]

It's a waste of public vote . They got evicted because they were unpopular ,so what's the point bringing them back it's daft .

[poppsywoppsy]

People paid good money to see the back of those evicted.

I do not want to ever see India again.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy

People paid good money to see the back of those evicted.

I do not want to ever see India again.

Exactly !

It's bad enough BB is ruining out of ideas,they always have the back door eviction stunt .
And in the past they've already brought back old hm's as a twist . They need new ideas .

[thisisdanny]

I clearly can't read properly cause I voted the wrong option oops