[Robodog]

Rachel Morris and Kate Marlow are not great at the best of times but tonight's show was awful from both of them.

I find it pretty worrying that both of them appear under some kind of banner marked 'psychologist' when really they are just giving their personal opinions like a regular panelist.

Fair enough they don't like Jim/Dexter/Aaron whoever but they really went for it tonight with uncomfortable amounts of bias, cheap shots and insults - no real psychological overview as you'd hope from the 'psych' show.

They had none of the fairness, balance, consideration, grace or eloquence of other psychologists such as Diane Youdale, Dr Funke etc. And certainly none of the sense of humour that those other psychologists have.

I think Rachel insulted the BB viewers tonight saying that Jim votes were just out of sympathy!
Err no Rachel - some people do actually like him for who he is!
BB viewers are not stupid and can make up their own minds about a housemate without a BOTP psychologist dismissing their thinking as wrong! How insulting!

Kate accused Jim of being an all out liar - 'it's in his narrow eyes and stiff arms! ' ?? WTF?
I've never heard such a load of rubbish. This is not psychology, this is just daft (and slightly spiteful) personal opinion making dressed up as psychology.

Ironically, they showed far more prejudice and negativity towards Jim in that one hour than has actually come from him in the entire 3 weeks!

I don't mind such opinions from a regular panelist or audience member but from a 'psychologist' i'd expect better.

Especially after Jim actually had a great show with his tree house talks, not one second of aggro and even managed to bond with Luisa and make her smile! All of which the BOTP panel chose to completely ignore.

Hope he wins now.