[aaronneely2017]

Pretty sure this one hasn't been asked but which series that is quite poorly received do you feel had a lot of potential to be great.

[Jake.]

8. The boot order pretty much killed the show post-Charley.

16 is an obvious one, too.

[Shaun]

BB4 would've been great if the boring clique didn't form; plenty of eccentric and fun housemates just relentless picked off one by one by Cameron, Gos and Steph.

15 would've been a lot better without an invincible Helen clique, too.

[Samm]

I enjoyed 16 before they chucked most of them out

[Captain.Remy]

16 had a great theme, but the producers really did an horrible job at executing it.
4 too, it had potential at first but the bores took it away from us.

The others series either had no potential of being great, or turned out great.

[Mitchell]

19, all the production elements were brilliant, but unfortunately the housemates selection just wasn’t good enough

[DouglasS]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

19, all the production elements were brilliant, but unfortunately the housemates selection just wasn’t good enough

The women of 19 especially were awful and boring.

Kenaley..Brooke.. Zoe.. Isabella..Sian (I liked her but she was a bit boring, especially for the comfiest two thirds)

[UserSince2005]

I think all **** series had the chance to be great if theyd swap some housemates out for others or what not. I dont really get the question.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by aaronneely2017

Pretty sure this one hasn't been asked

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

The women of 19 especially were awful and boring.

Kenaley..Brooke.. Zoe.. Isabella..Sian (I liked her but she was a bit boring, especially for the comfiest two thirds)

Quite truthfully, the men were just as bad.