| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
According to Heat:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I think Heat tends to take the piss more than put them on pedestals.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Jolly good
|
Don't know, I don't buy it... but I don't like the effect it has on Big Brother. They - and other celebrity gossip magazines - support and reward certain housemates (usually those involved in 'shomances') and ignore others. And lads' magazines and tabloids reward housemates based on how good-looking they are.
That has influenced the type of HMs we see each year I think, and affected the way they act... you could say even corrupted BB a bit I think because the show is supposed to be based around personality. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
I completely agree with you there, James.
In general - I think heat can be very confusing sometimes. One week it applauds and supports a celebrity for doing something, only for them to attack and criticise them the next. A good few examples would be Amy Winehouse, Britney and Jordan. Ironically I buy heat mostly for the music/film reviews sections, and occasionally read the news/interviews. I couldn't really care less about their circle of shame. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|