had he not been exploited, had he keep the "me mam" act going on. or would Sophie have still triumphed

[Colbert-Bump]

Charlie thought he was funny but he wasn't compared to Marcus & Sophie.

[MiuMiu]

No. He just tried TO darn hard to be likable.
IMO.

[Angus]

[rquote=2547539&tid=146903&author=atieah2009]had he not been exploited, had he keep the "me mam" act going on. or would Sophie have still triumphed[/rquote]

No, in fact if BB had lasted any longer Charlie would have not finished in top 5. The only person to exploit anything was Charlie himself, using his Mum's illness for the sympathy vote which the public are now heartily sick of. No amount of sympathy for his mum, could disguise Charlie's hateful personality. So glad people saw through it, and he didn't win.

[Barbie]

No, i think he was trying too hard and it was clear that he was, and his horrible side was shining through more and more if BB had been on another week or 2 he would probably have been quick to be evicted.

[Harry!]

I'm afraid using the white flag doesn't work anyore on TV.

[Vicky.]

Not really...the mother thing, the nana thing, the constantly mentioning that he was a nice guy and the general fakeness that surrounded him all contributed to him not winning.

[mother6]

I think that his biggest downfall was the way in which he turned on Lisa. They had been friends with for thirteen weeks and to behave the way he did opened the publics eyes to his falseness.

[chris1232]

no.

[alan1965]

its a game sad ppl.charlie was a good guy honest not fake like dogface.eh i thought carrots grew on trees feck off sad wannabe.getting breasts done too 30j.look a right clown.