[ash2006]

big brother have again steped in to nomination process again and stoped the nominated housemate only being up

it just shows that big brother dont want to risk bea or marcus so giving them a chance to be voted against other hm

[muchadoaboutnothing]

They did the same thing when Lisa and Charlie had the most nominations a few weeks ago.

[scot]

get real...marcus woulda been safe this nom time.

Also Marcus woulda been safe even if nominated cos he woulda been up against lisa/david.

if anything this gives Lisa and David a fighting chance cos Hira has now gotta be a fav to get booted.

[Kazanne]

So annoyed that BB have done that.Marcus and Bea up for eviction,BB has changed it because of Marcus and siavash's rule breaking,We could have got rid of the nasty Bea this week Grrrrrrrr

[scot]

Originally posted by muchadoaboutnothing
They did the same thing when Lisa and Charlie had the most nominations a few weeks ago.

exactly...if they are protecting anyone its lisa

[u_drunk]

Originally posted by muchadoaboutnothing
They did the same thing when Lisa and Charlie had the most nominations a few weeks ago.

but big brother had to put them all up that week!

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by muchadoaboutnothing
They did the same thing when Lisa and Charlie had the most nominations a few weeks ago.

people seem to forget this.

They would rather just stick with their conspiracy theories

[scot]

Originally posted by u_drunk

but big brother had to put them all up that week!

er, no...not lisa, they protected her. lisa didnt go to the public vote

[Shasown]

Which makes the end result fairer, because its the viewers selection.

Lets face it if it was down to nominations from the housemates every week, then the final couple of weeks would be very boring, Hira, Rodrigo, Charlie, Sophie and Halfwit.

Should be a vote to save from start to finish, maybe with appeals from housemates during the diary room chats

[u_drunk]

Originally posted by scot

er, no...not lisa, they protected her. lisa didnt go to the public vote

yea because her and roddy were the only ones who didnt discuss nomations...so they put the rest up...which they had to do cause they all broke the rule!

[muchadoaboutnothing]

It is hardly a fitting punishment. As Siavash has broken the fundemental rules of BB they should kick him out and I actually like Siavash. There are a lot of people who auditioned for BB who would have loved the chance to be in the house and partake in the nominations.

[scot]

Originally posted by u_drunk

yea because her and roddy were the only ones who didnt discuss nomations...so they put the rest up...which they had to do cause they all broke the rule!

er well, actually it was cos her and the rod shat it to put themselves forward for the public vote. Cowards. the rest of the house led by marcus and siavash put themselves up and faced the public. brave.

[Shasown]

BB reserves the right to change the rules at any time.

Siavash's plan could almost have been instigated by BB, makes voting fairer, more importantly will probably result in more money going in from the phone votes.

[BB22]

Every week, no matter what happens, we get these conspiracy theories. There is no evidence for any of them.

[smartalec2718]

Even if there is a conspiracy theory with any merit out there, I don't care. I'm happy BB put everyone up and made it a vote to save - this is about the time in the game when all the entertaining HM's start leaving and instead we have a chance to boot out the boring ones who have no fan bases. Let's keep Halfwit, Siavash, Marcus, Lisa, Bea, Charlie, and Dogface (the entertaining and/or controversial people). Let's dump Hira, Rodrigo, or preferably David (the boring HM's).

[chris1232]

Originally posted by smartalec2718
Even if there is a conspiracy theory with any merit out there, I don't care. I'm happy BB put everyone up and made it a vote to save - this is about the time in the game when all the entertaining HM's start leaving and instead we have a chance to boot out the boring ones who have no fan bases. Let's keep Halfwit, Siavash, Marcus, Lisa, Bea, Charlie, and Dogface (the entertaining and/or controversial people). Let's dump Hira, Rodrigo, or preferably David (the boring HM's).

you speak sense my friend.

[Shasown]

Its just strange that Siavash has gave them the excuse a few times now for Endemol to make bigger profits from increased phone calls and get higher rating figures than normal.

[The_Long_Run]

Originally posted by muchadoaboutnothing
They did the same thing when Lisa and Charlie had the most nominations a few weeks ago.

Difference is, the HMs wanted Lisa out so deliberately arranged it that the one they thought was safest to put up against her. They believe Charlie is favourite so it would be 100% safe to nominate him against her.


Anyway, the bookies don't believe Bea will be getting many 'to save' votes and have her second fovourite to go.

http://www.oddschecker.com/specials/.../next-eviction

[HarryRag]

Originally posted by ash2006
big brother have again steped in to nomination process again and stoped the nominated housemate only being up

it just shows that big brother dont want to risk bea or marcus so giving them a chance to be voted against other hm

they did save lisa and charlie too. time to make things even.

[molineuxwolf]

Originally posted by VickyJ

people seem to forget this.

They would rather just stick with their conspiracy theories

not really, because what people also forget is that they had said before that if the new HM's didnt do the task, they'd be up (basically, if the others who broke the rules weren't up, lisa wouldnt be anyway)

this time they did it when they knew who was up for eviction

[ash2006]

they only saved lisa becasce she didnt break the rules but this time they have put the whole house up and people who did not break the rules