[Stevep]

I keep hearing it is 'morally wrong', that she is a '*****' and whatever else. To anyone who keeps accusing her of such things, would you mind explaining why it is morally wrong?

Her job is to chat to blokes, they know the deal from the start, they know they will be getting nothing else from the interaction other than a chat. In exchange she gets paid, as far as i can tell there is no deception involved or anything along those lines, so what is so wrong about it? She is not leading them on, she, i guess, tells them what they want to hear and they pay her for it. Yes, i can see how that particular job would not be to everybody's taste, and i guess i can see why most people wouldn't respect that line of work, but to claim it is morally wrong is way out of line, because as far as i can see there is no deception involved at all. It is what it is and everybody knows the deal right from the get go.

[sampvt]

The only deception here mate is the one she has you under. Many of her type have been interviewed and voiced opinions. There aint no way she is getting those anounts of money or gifts for chatting. Chat lines get those fools. Many in the know say she is 100% using this simple chat line theory to cover up what she really does, prostitution. Dont be fooled mate, she is a ***** and her boyfriend cleverly illuded this question because he k ows the truth. If she had have been a chat only girl, he would have stipulated it. 100k for a signed semi clad photo, you need to be seriously sheltered to believe that crap.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by sampvt

The only deception here mate is the one she has you under. Many of her type have been interviewed and voiced opinions. There aint no way she is getting those anounts of money or gifts for chatting. Chat lines get those fools. Many in the know say she is 100% using this simple chat line theory to cover up what she really does, prostitution Dont be fooled mate, she is a ***** and her boyfriend cleverly illuded this question because he k ows the truth. If she had have been a chat only girl, he would have stipulated it. 100k for a signed semi clad photo, you need to be seriously sheltered to believe that crap.

BIB.. where have you seen this?

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Gillian-73

BIB.. where have you seen this?

Are you some kind of distant disbeliever of anything. Use google, read up on the person you are defending then you can speak from a position of strength or like the others before you, read about her then slink away and lick your wounds. she is a 100% pure thorobred tart with a history of prostitution.

[Gillian-73]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Are you some kind of distant disbeliever of anything. Use google, read up on the person you are defending then you can speak from a position of strength or like the others before you, read about her then slink away and lick your wounds. she is a 100% pure thorobred tart with a history of prostitution.

How am i defending her? All the questions i ask you you never answer them. I don't like Danica so a fail on your part again, i was asking were you have seen what you say you have seen!
How is that defending her exactly i would love to know.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Gillian-73

How am i defending her? All the questions i ask you you never answer them. I don't like Danica so a fail on your part again, i was asking were you have seen what you say you have seen!
How is that defending her exactly i would love to know.

FFS are you deliberately trying to wind me up. GOOGLE HER NAME AND TV ELITE. There are about 15 video clips of her rubbing and fingering herself and if that doesent get you off or convinced. go further and search for links to her lifestyle. I am not about to do your dirty work for you. Oh and if you think she osnt doing anything immoral, let your wife or girlfriend or partner do it and see what you think.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by sampvt

The only deception here mate is the one she has you under. Many of her type have been interviewed and voiced opinions. There aint no way she is getting those anounts of money or gifts for chatting. Chat lines get those fools. Many in the know say she is 100% using this simple chat line theory to cover up what she really does, prostitution. Dont be fooled mate, she is a ***** and her boyfriend cleverly illuded this question because he k ows the truth. If she had have been a chat only girl, he would have stipulated it. 100k for a signed semi clad photo, you need to be seriously sheltered to believe that crap.

supposition!

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by sampvt

The only deception here mate is the one she has you under. Many of her type have been interviewed and voiced opinions. There aint no way she is getting those anounts of money or gifts for chatting. Chat lines get those fools. Many in the know say she is 100% using this simple chat line theory to cover up what she really does, prostitution. Dont be fooled mate, she is a ***** and her boyfriend cleverly illuded this question because he k ows the truth. If she had have been a chat only girl, he would have stipulated it. 100k for a signed semi clad photo, you need to be seriously sheltered to believe that crap.

Quick question for you if Danica is a prostitute, what would you call the married men who avail of her services?

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by CherieB

Quick question for you if Danica is a prostitute, what would you call the married men who avail of her services?

Desperate

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by CherieB

Quick question for you if Danica is a prostitute, what would you call the married men who avail of her services?

Customers

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by sampvt

Customers

Personally I would call them satisfied.

However,
if there were no "customers" Danica wouldnt be a "prostitute", so maybe you should turn your moral outrage on the customers.

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by sampvt

The only deception here mate is the one she has you under. Many of her type have been interviewed and voiced opinions. There aint no way she is getting those anounts of money or gifts for chatting. Chat lines get those fools. Many in the know say she is 100% using this simple chat line theory to cover up what she really does, prostitution. Dont be fooled mate, she is a ***** and her boyfriend cleverly illuded this question because he k ows the truth. If she had have been a chat only girl, he would have stipulated it. 100k for a signed semi clad photo, you need to be seriously sheltered to believe that crap.

You are speculating. You cannot hate on a person because of what you assume, and that is all it is; assumptions based on vicious rumours.

And, btw, you are wrong, people are not hating on her because they believe she is a secret prostitute, they are hating on her because of what they believe (or what they have been fed by Jasmine) is a morally wrong interaction (gifts etc), and as i mentioned above, there is nothing morally wrong with what she does.

[reece(:]

search Danica thralll elite tv in google and you'll see why.

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by reece(:

search Danica thralll elite tv in google and you'll see why.

What, She gets her kit off, so what? As i said above, i can see why people don't respect it, i don't particularly respect it either, but it is not morally wrong.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Stevep

What, She gets her kit off, so what? As i said above, i can see why people don't respect it, i don't particularly respect it either, but it is not morally wrong.

Would you be happy for your daughter to do this for a living?

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Would you be happy for your daughter to do this for a living?

As i said before, i don't particularly respect the job, but to call it morally wrong is not right. I would have called it immoral if she was deceiving the people she was chatting to, but both sides know the deal from the start.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Stevep

As i said before, i don't particularly respect the job, but to call it morally wrong is not right. I would have called it immoral if she was deceiving anything, but both sides know the deal from the start.

Do they though? Danica seems to be very very good at making men think they have a chance with her... Those lonely old men are probably parting with their money after being flattered and flirted with.

I'm sorry but I just cannot accept that anybody would purchase a diamond necklace worth thousands of pounds for a manky signed photo! She's leading these men on in the same way she is the guys in the house

[Yayita]

Originally Posted by reece(:

search Danica thralll elite tv in google and you'll see why.

Holly hell Reece!!!! I hadnt seen this... so she has done more than just set up wish lists and have guys get her gifts LOL... I was naive to believe it!! Now she is an Internet Slut and Phone Sex Slut.

But still wont call her prostitute unless I see her having sex for money.

[armand.kay]

No one said it was 'morally wrong' but she is a *****.

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

No one said it was 'morally wrong' but she is a *****.

Everybody says it is morally wrong.

[Withano]

As far as I've ever read, people pay her to spend her time chatting online.
I'd imagine there's some sort of camera involved where she gets her tits out in exchange for money.
Obviously its not very moral, but I think given the chance, most people across the world would get naked on camera for hundreds of thousands a year.
But even she has said before, the majority of her job is modelling and then she sends out signed copies in exchange for a gift
I wouldn't call her a prostitute, she's not ****ing a thing. She's being payed to make other people **** themselves, so more of a pornstar. But not even the good kind, cos she's not ****ing anyone!

I don't really know, all I know is if somebody was famous for making girls pay to see their dick, nobody would care.

[kefln]

Originally Posted by Stevep

I keep hearing it is 'morally wrong', that she is a '*****' and whatever else. To anyone who keeps accusing her of such things, would you mind explaining why it is morally wrong?

Her job is to chat to blokes, they know the deal from the start, they know they will be getting nothing else from the interaction other than a chat. In exchange she gets paid, as far as i can tell there is no deception involved or anything along those lines, so what is so wrong about it? She is not leading them on, she, i guess, tells them what they want to hear and they pay her for it. Yes, i can see how that particular job would not be to everybody's taste, and i guess i can see why most people wouldn't respect that line of work, but to claim it is morally wrong is way out of line, because as far as i can see there is no deception involved at all. It is what it is and everybody knows the deal right from the get go.

Because people love to judge, almost as much as they like to throw mud.

Its easier to use words like "*****", finger point and make stuff up.

If Danica was sleeping around, then the media would have dug it up. Someone would have come forward, just to make a quick buck. Stories of 4 in a bed romps would be circulating. Along with the usual badly taken snap shots of her lying across someones bed.

But that hasn't happened.

There is a couple of clips of her on the internet on Elite TV, a few lads mag photographs and her website.

Danica uses her looks as a business. Some might find that horrible, others don't care. I'm for the latter. She isn't hurting me, so who cares?

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by kefln

Because people love to judge, almost as much as they like to throw mud.

Its easier to use words like "*****", finger point and make stuff up.

If Danica was sleeping around, then the media would have dug it up. Someone would have come forward, just to make a quick buck. Stories of 4 in a bed romps would be circulating. Along with the usual badly taken snap shots of her lying across someones bed.

But that hasn't happened.

There is a couple of clips of her on the internet on Elite TV, a few lads mag photographs and her website.

Danica uses her looks as a business. Some might find that horrible, others don't care. I'm for the latter. She isn't hurting me, so who cares?

For me, i think it is a case of sub-conscious jealousy, possibly in terms of looks or even because she is making lots of money without really having to work for it. People are looking for reasons to hate even if they have no real realson to hate. I mentioned this in another thread, but there is something that NikKi Grahaeme said on BBOTS that pretty much summed this up. She said 'i think she comes across as a really sweet girl, but i want to hate her.'

[kefln]

Originally Posted by Stevep

For me, i think it is a case of sub-conscious jealousy, possibly in terms of looks or even because she is making lots of money without really having to work for it. People are looking for reasons to hate even if they have no real realson to hate. I mentioned this in another thread, but there is something that NikKi Grahaeme said on BBOTS that pretty much summed this up. She said 'i think she comes across as a really sweet girl, but i want to hate her.'

Thats it, spot on.

She's an attractive, sweet natured girl, that seems totally at ease with herself and got on with everyone almost instantly. And she makes money for doing almost nothing.

I can see why people would want to hate her. Its like she cheating the system.

But thats not fair. And you could see it in her eyes when Jasmine went for her. The stigma, the miss understanding, of her job will be there for the rest of her life.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by kefln

Thats it, spot on.

She's an attractive, sweet natured girl, that seems totally at ease with herself and got on with everyone almost instantly. And she makes money for doing almost nothing.

I can see why people would want to hate her. Its like she cheating the system.

But thats not fair. And you could see it in her eyes when Jasmine went for her. The stigma, the miss understanding, of her job will be there for the rest of her life.

Oh I totally agree with you, she is a sweet innocent little misunderstood girl. She goes to charity meetings, helps kids in Africa and does loads of volunteer work in between fingering herself on a web cam and fleecing old sad farts of their savinbgs that trust and like her to make sence of their own sad and deprived lives.

Yes you have me convinced, I cant understand why she isnt on this years honours list. It might conflict with her new title though, Princess Dianica spaghetti muncher MBE. Now that would get her a few more gifts wouldnt it.

Oh and by the way, she laid into Mikey like a hurricane and didnt rise to being called a call girl and hooker by Jasmine, I wonder why. Could it be she knows the truth hurts and she needs to come out to a future rinsing sad old men that view her as a woman they are in need of and who think they have a chance of future sexual promises. That is how they operate yes, I would love to be with you now doing this and that etc etc. I doubt if she gets many diamond prezzies discussing Man utd,s chances of doing the treble this year.