[Robodog]

I'm not 'anti' Pav.

But i'm not 'pro' Pav either.

In fact i'm not 'anything' Pav as Pav (IMO) hasn't brought anything to the show.

Despite his VT giving it the large (as they all do in their VTs) - the only thing he has done in the house is talk about where he stands in the group and how he doesn't feel accepted. And weeks later - he is still saying it.

Yet Zoe and Biannca were in there for much less time than Pav - but they never kept talking about it like he does - they just got on with it and dived head first into the experience.

He seems like an ok guy but in terms of this being a TV show - i honestly don't get why would anyone want Pav to win ? (unless it was because they disliked all other finalists)

Am i missing something?

[Yaki da]

A sense of irony.

[Robodog]

You mean it would be ironic for the person who did the least to win the show?

That would be ironic alright. It happened last year.

[Alf]

Attention

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by wannashag

Attention

You mean people want Pav to win out of attention?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Robodog

You mean people want Pav to win out of attention?

I'm not telling you.

You'll just have to make up your own conclusion.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by wannashag

I'm not telling you.

You'll just have to make up your own conclusion.

OK. I have made my conclusion.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Purely to take the piss.

Its a shame he may end up winning, the public should really be voting whos provided the best entertainment.

Its actually quite insulting to him aswell but im sure the 100k will ease that.

[Lister of Smeg]

Hipsters

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg

Hipsters

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Purely to take the piss.

Its a shame he may end up winning, the public should really be voting whos provided the best entertainment.

Its actually quite insulting to him aswell but im sure the 100k will ease that.

Ha yeah - he won't be complaining. Remember his first moment in the diary when he shouted 'Gimme da power!' ?

But yeah. The 'anti-vote' is about the only reason i can see people voting Pav. Certainly not for entertainment value.

[Lostie!]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Purely to take the piss.

Its a shame he may end up winning, the public should really be voting whos provided the best entertainment.

Its actually quite insulting to him aswell but im sure the 100k will ease that.

I'd rather speak for myself. Some people actually like him.

Christopher is my pick, but I wouldn't mind Pav winning for the simple fact that he seems like a nice guy. Nice is highly underrated by fans of this show nowadays.

Also, "boring" is subjective. I've personally been bored by Helen's bad attitude for 9 weeks.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

I'd rather speak for myself. Some people actually like him.

Christopher is my pick, but I wouldn't mind Pav winning for the simple fact that he seems like a nice guy. Nice is highly underrated by fans of this show nowadays.

Also, "boring" is subjective. I've personally been bored by Helen's bad attitude for 9 weeks.

Completely agree, and when i hear all this crap such as what has he done, i would counter what has anyone else done that hasn't been offensive or downright boring. The voting public have deemed him to be a worthy finalist, there is no need of any further justification.

As to whether he wins, if he does, fantastic, if not, he wont be leaving under a cloud of controversy.

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Completely agree, and when i hear all this crap such as what has he done, i would counter what has anyone else done that hasn't been offensive or downright boring. The voting public have deemed him to be a worthy finalist, there is no need of any further justification.

As to whether he wins, if he does, fantastic, if not, he wont be leaving under a cloud of controversy.

So far, whether he wins or not he won't leave under a cloud of anything either controversial or entertaining

'What has he done?' is perfectly legitimate argument - it's a TV show after all - there is some requirement for HMs to be watchable be that positive or negative. Anything is better than nothing, no matter how ok the HMs are as people.

A house full of Pavs would be worse than watching BB4

[bots]

Originally Posted by Robodog

So far, whether he wins or not he won't leave under a cloud of anything either controversial or entertaining

'What has he done?' is perfectly legitimate argument - it's a TV show after all - there is some requirement for HMs to be watchable be that positive or negative. Anything is better than nothing, no matter how ok the HMs are as people.

A house full of Pavs would be worse than watching BB4

And that's fine, we are all entitled to our opinion

That's the beauty of the vote to win stage, prefer someone else, vote for them. Get whoever out campaigns are meaningless now The hm with the most votes wins - great.

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Robodog

I'm not 'anti' Pav.

But i'm not 'pro' Pav either.

In fact i'm not 'anything' Pav as Pav (IMO) hasn't brought anything to the show.

Despite his VT giving it the large (as they all do in their VTs) - the only thing he has done in the house is talk about where he stands in the group and how he doesn't feel accepted. And weeks later - he is still saying it.

Yet Zoe and Biannca were in there for much less time than Pav - but they never kept talking about it like he does - they just got on with it and dived head first into the experience.

He seems like an ok guy but in terms of this being a TV show - i honestly don't get why would anyone want Pav to win ? (unless it was because they disliked all other finalists)

Am i missing something?

Same ole reasons. "Pav has been misunderstood". "Pav has not been treated right". "No one gives him a change".

Oh please...other new housemates were on same position. Only "poor" Pav did suffer...

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by MojoNixon

Same ole reasons. "Pav has been misunderstood". "Pav has not been treated right". "No one gives him a change".

Oh please...other new housemates were on same position. Only "poor" Pav did suffer...

Love how you've got Regan as your avatar btw

Total legend

[MojoNixon]

Originally Posted by Robodog

Love how you've got Regan as your avatar btw

Total legend

[reece(:]

As a joke?

[Fish_Fingers]

The only scenario that I would want him to win in would be if the final three were him, Ash and Helen.

[Tregard]

Protest vote

[Withano]

The rest are try-hards

[billy123]

Because he isnt a twat?

[DanielLuis]

He has 0 chance. He will fight with Ash for 5th place, and I wouldn't be surprised if one of them broke Jenny's great record of 0.9% to win in the voting.

[Ammi]

..as a person he seems nice but as a housemate he's contributed nothing to the series and for me it would be all kinds of wrong for him to win..I think I would even rather Helen won as she's been the 'bigger housemate'..unless I'm missing something, it seems like maybe people less want him to win than don't want others to but that seems like for all the wrong reasons in the spirit of the 'game'....