[Brillopad]

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...h-Diane-Abbott

There are those that believe that if they say something enough times the fairy of good fortune will shower them with favour and it will come true - if you believe in fairies that is.

Bless him he keeps on trying!!!

[Tom4784]

You mustn't think it's that unrealistic since you post about ten threads a day bashing him.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...h-Diane-Abbott

There are those that believe that if they say something enough times the fairy of good fortune will shower them with favour and it will come true - if you believe in fairies that is.

Bless him he keeps on trying!!!

I thought this thread was gonna be about the Beatles brillo

[DemolitionRed]

Its telling when you read the comments on that article.

What makes me laugh is the amount of attention Corbyn is getting from those who hate him. An unhealthy interest and the need for reassurance from like minded others, goes to show how threatened people feel.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Its telling when you read the comments on that article.

What makes me laugh is the amount of attention Corbyn is getting from those who hate him. An unhealthy interest and the need for reassurance from like minded others, goes to show how threatened people feel.

Yup, this level of obsession from the media and his haters would not happen if he had no chance of following through and becoming PM.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

You mustn't think it's that unrealistic since you post about ten threads a day bashing him.

I challenge you to prove I post ten threads a day bashing him.

I never have - and certainly not much more recently. I think there have been about two articles relating to him that have grabbed my attention in the last few days that I made a thread about. Nice bit of exaggeration there again.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I challenge you to prove I post ten threads a day bashing him.

I never have - and certainly not much more recently. I think there have been about two articles relating to him that have grabbed my attention in the last few days that I made a thread about. Nice bit of exaggeration there again.

…You've made two today and a third attacking the people that voted for him

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

I thought this thread was gonna be about the Beatles brillo

Sorry if a bit confusing Kaz, slightly annoyed by his repetitive rhetoric - he's such a twit.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Smithy

…You've made two today and a third attacking the people that voted for him

I said about two. Hardly ten. Where were the ten yesterday, or the day before etc.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

Yup, this level of obsession from the media and his haters would not happen if he had no chance of following through and becoming PM.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I said about two. Hardly ten. Where were the ten yesterday, or the day before etc.

you said about two in the last few days, not last few hours

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Smithy

you said about two in the last few days, not last few hours

Were there any yesterday or the day before?

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I challenge you to prove I post ten threads a day bashing him.

I never have - and certainly not much more recently. I think there have been about two articles relating to him that have grabbed my attention in the last few days that I made a thread about. Nice bit of exaggeration there again.

joke
dʒəʊk/Submit
noun
1.
a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.
"she was in a mood to tell jokes"
synonyms: funny story, jest, witticism, quip, pleasantry; More
verb
1.
make jokes; talk humorously or flippantly.
"she could laugh and joke with her colleagues"
synonyms: tell jokes, crack jokes; More

The 'ten threads a day' was exaggeration for comedic effect because, you see, Brillo, sometimes to make light of silly situations people use things like exaggeration or overstatements to highlight the ridiculousness of it all.

Do you understand or do I have to break it down even further for you?

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

joke
dʒəʊk/Submit
noun
1.
a thing that someone says to cause amusement or laughter, especially a story with a funny punchline.
"she was in a mood to tell jokes"
synonyms: funny story, jest, witticism, quip, pleasantry; More
verb
1.
make jokes; talk humorously or flippantly.
"she could laugh and joke with her colleagues"
synonyms: tell jokes, crack jokes; More

The 'ten threads a day' was exaggeration for comedic effect because, you see, Brillo, sometimes to make light of silly situations people use things like exaggeration or overstatements to highlight the ridiculousness of it all.

Do you understand or do I have to break it down even further for you?

And I called you on your constant ridiculous attempts to humiliate me out of making threads you don't like by trying to disguise your motives with humour.

Your meaning was clear - 'humour' was just a get out clause.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

And I called you on your constant ridiculous attempts to humiliate me out of making threads you don't like by trying to disguise your motives with humour.

Your meaning was clear - 'humour' was just a get out clause.

I'm entitled to my opinion, I know that you dislike that Freedom of Speech allows opinions other than your own but you just got to deal with it.

You are entitled to make as many obsessive Corbyn hate threads you want and people are free to comment on them as they see fit. Freedom of speech benefits everyone, not just you.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

I'm entitled to my opinion, I know that you dislike that Freedom of Speech allows opinions other than your own but you just got to deal with it.

You are entitled to make as many obsessive Corbyn hate threads you want and people are free to comment on them as they see fit. Freedom of speech benefits everyone, not just you.

You can talk. You are the one trying to stop me posting threads with a negative opinion of Corbyn by implying I am obsessed and posting an excessive amount of threads on him. If I come across an article that interests me, about Corbyn or not, I like to make a thread. What is your problem with that?

Just ignore them. If You have to pass your negative comments on them to do so by keep harping on about how many I make, which really aren't that many - get some perspective, is ridiculous. Your comments should be about the content not the number.

If they bother you so much I can only assume they point out issues you don't want aired. Is this or is it not a discussion forum on serious debates. Politicians are fair game and any criticism works both ways.

If a certain group did not keep responding with all their sarcasm and negativity maybe the threads would just disappear after a few posts. It's all a silly childish drama about nothing.

So feel free to be negative about the content of the posts. That is what such a forum is about.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

You mustn't think it's that unrealistic since you post about ten threads a day bashing him.

Then why don't his followers post some positive threads about him that doesn't involve him running around at rallies creating divisions. You know, some recent successes or something...oh wait...

[jet]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You can talk. You are the one trying to stop me posting threads with a negative opinion of Corbyn by implying I am obsessed and posting an excessive amount of threads on him. If I come across an article that interests me, about Corbyn or not, I like to make a thread. What is your problem with that?

Just ignore them. If You have to pass your negative comments on them to do so by keep harping on about how many I make, which really aren't that many - get some perspective, is ridiculous. Your comments should be about the content not the number. If they bother you so much I can only assume they point out issues you don't want aired. Is this or is it not a discussion forum on serious debates. Politicians are fair game and any criticism works both ways.

If a certain group did not keep responding with all their sarcasm and negativity maybe the threads would just disappear after a few posts. It's all a silly childish drama about nothing.

So feel free to be negative about the content of the posts. That is what such a forum is about.

Nail meet head.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by jet

Then why don't his followers post some positive threads about him that doesn't involve him running around at rallies creating divisions. You know, some recent successes or something...oh wait...

Well said Jet!

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You can talk. You are the one trying to stop me posting threads with a negative opinion of Corbyn by implying I am obsessed and posting an excessive amount of threads on him. If I come across an article that interests me, about Corbyn or not, I like to make a thread. What is your problem with that?

Just ignore them. If You have to pass your negative comments on them to do so by keep harping on about how many I make, which really aren't that many - get some perspective, is ridiculous. Your comments should be about the content not the number.

If they bother you so much I can only assume they point out issues you don't want aired. Is this or is it not a discussion forum on serious debates. Politicians are fair game and any criticism works both ways.

If a certain group did not keep responding with all their sarcasm and negativity maybe the threads would just disappear after a few posts. It's all a silly childish drama about nothing.

So feel free to be negative about the content of the posts. That is what such a forum is about.

How am I trying to stop you from doing anything? All I've said is that it's not that unrealistic for Corbyn to be PM and that you probably think the same given how eager you are to post threads bashing him because that's exactly what the media does. I'm allowed to comment on threads, I don't need your permission to do so and neither does anyone else.

Why should I ignore posts because you can't handle opinions that aren't your own? There's not much content to talk about in these articles, just the bleating of a biased media catering to it's readers that are bitter about young people and diversity and long for the days when you could be as racist as you like and get away with it.

Ooooh so you want to people to stop sharing their opinion so these threads can 'disappear' which basically means you want your opinion to be unopposed and then you say the complete opposite in the last sentence of your post. It's also a bit ironic to call anyone else childish when your go to counter argument in any situation is 'I know you are but what am I?'

Originally Posted by jet

Then why don't his followers post some positive threads about him that doesn't involve him running around at rallies creating divisions. You know, some recent successes or something...oh wait...

'Post some positive Corbyn stories but not any that I don't like! Glastonbury? DON'T EVER MENTION THAT AGAIN! Labour's gains in the elections? HE IS TERRORIST SCUM!'

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

You can talk. You are the one trying to stop me posting threads with a negative opinion of Corbyn by implying I am obsessed and posting an excessive amount of threads on him. If I come across an article that interests me, about Corbyn or not, I like to make a thread. What is your problem with that?

Just ignore them. If You have to pass your negative comments on them to do so by keep harping on about how many I make, which really aren't that many - get some perspective, is ridiculous. Your comments should be about the content not the number.

If they bother you so much I can only assume they point out issues you don't want aired. Is this or is it not a discussion forum on serious debates. Politicians are fair game and any criticism works both ways.

If a certain group did not keep responding with all their sarcasm and negativity maybe the threads would just disappear after a few posts. It's all a silly childish drama about nothing.

So feel free to be negative about the content of the posts. That is what such a forum is about.

Unless you point out K&Cs dire response and mays unsupportive 'visit' to Grenfell..... Then there are all manner of objections

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

How am I trying to stop you from doing anything? All I've said is that it's not that unrealistic for Corbyn to be PM and that you probably think the same given how eager you are to post threads bashing him because that's exactly what the media does. I'm allowed to comment on threads, I don't need your permission to do so and neither does anyone else.

Why should I ignore posts because you can't handle opinions that aren't your own? There's not much content to talk about in these articles, just the bleating of a biased media catering to it's readers that are bitter about young people and diversity and long for the days when you could be as racist as you like and get away with it.

Ooooh so you want to people to stop sharing their opinion so these threads can 'disappear' which basically means you want your opinion to be unopposed and then you say the complete opposite in the last sentence of your post. It's also a bit ironic to call anyone else childish when your go to counter argument in any situation is 'I know you are but what am I?'





'Post some positive Corbyn stories but not any that I don't like! Glastonbury? DON'T EVER MENTION THAT AGAIN! Labour's gains in the elections? HE IS TERRORIST SCUM!'

I really don't know what is going on in your head when you read my posts. When did I say it wasn't alright for you to pass comment on my threads? I just said it is unnecessary to take the piss out of how many I make - there really aren't that many. I haven't seen any rules on here about how many posts we can make so to keep singling me out on this is baiting.

Why would I want my posts to disappear - that makes no sense. There is a cloud of red mist in your head when you read my posts I think that makes you hear what you want to hear.

I was just pointing out that if you didn't keep posting about how many threads I have made on a given subject, many may be less interested in the thread as there would be less drama in it. Like anyone I want people to be interested in the threads I make and post on them - and any dramatics make it more likely the thread will get more posts. So why would I object to that?

It is your constant attempts to undermine me based on how many posts I make that I object to. It is clearly an attempt to shut me up which is not acceptable.

[Crimson Dynamo]

The alternative is COMMUNISM


and the masks..


yep

[jet]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

'Post some positive Corbyn stories but not any that I don't like! Glastonbury? DON'T EVER MENTION THAT AGAIN! Labour's gains in the elections? HE IS TERRORIST SCUM!'

Getting a bit hot under the collar?..

Post some actually sensible positive stories about Corbyn that proves he actually will make the future better for all and I'll concede that despite his awful past history having him as a PM would be worthwhile for the country.

So far all we have is lavish promises to students, pensioners and the public sector which are criminally irresponsible. I can only hope he is growing magic money trees by the dozen in that allotment of his.

Glastonbury...the BBC works outing, there is Corbyn, the man who the audience could identify with, brought up in a seven - bedroom Manor House, addressing a mainly well - heeled crowd of haven't a clue middle and upper classes about the situations of the really impoverished. There they were, in their £100 wellies, having paid nearly £300 for their tickets, some of them crashing out in their £1000 tepees, or £11,000 from Daddy's trust fund for a six - berth yurt, in their drink, dance, drug and sex haze, celebrities included, feeling all Marxist and Terribly Terribly Socialist and good and not so guilty about themselves by deigning to care about the poor souls who hadn't a hope in hell of actually being among their number at the festival. Take money out of their pockets to give to those poor souls and lets see how they holler 'OH! Jeremy Cor- byn' in a totally different way then....

The whole debacle is just shallow, divisive, self serving posturing at it's very worst.

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

I really don't know what is going on in your head when you read my posts. When did I say it wasn't alright for you to pass comment on my threads? I just said it is unnecessary to take the piss out of how many I make - there really aren't that many. I haven't seen any rules on here about how many posts we can make so to keep singling me out on this is baiting.

Why would I want my posts to disappear - that makes no sense. There is a cloud of red mist in your head when you read my posts I think that makes you hear what you want to hear.

I was just pointing out that if you didn't keep posting about how many threads I have made on a given subject, many may be less interested in the thread as there would be less drama in it. Like anyone I want people to be interested in the threads I make and post on them - and any dramatics make it more likely the thread will get more posts. So why would I object to that?

It is your constant attempts to undermine me based on how many posts I make that I object to. It is clearly an attempt to shut me up which is not acceptable.

Having a different opinion to you is not baiting. Honestly, it's rather annoying how many members of this forum use 'bating' as a way to try to get people with opposing opinions in trouble. It's not a word you can just throw out to silence people.

I made a point with my original post, the media isn't smearing any other left leaning people or organisations that aren't Jeremy Corbyn and that's because they aren't likely to be in power. The closer he gets to power the more desperate the media becomes to smear him by any means necessary. They'll scoff at the idea of JC becoming PM and say it'll never happen but they won't stop smearing him because they know it's not unrealistic. It's exactly the same with your hate threads, I was drawing a parallel.

We don't see multiple threads from you or articles in the media bashing the Green Party for example so it's less about the 'left' and more about JC.