[BusyBee]

So now its a couple of weeks since the end of the Evil BB and thinking about it I think the producers succeeded in some aspects but failed in others.

For instance - leaving one housemate without their case for their time in the house - missed out because Kitten couldnt care one way or the other and only lasted a week anyway.

Kitten put in there to stir things up - she did, but so well that they got rid of her.

To be truly evil they should have restricted their food supply when t hey failed tasks as in the past - even on staple rations they ate well.

The weekly task when they ended up hanging in stinging nettles - yes they got the evil bit right there.

The Sargeants and Privates task - that worked well.

Chaining the housemates together - apart from Michelle getting in a strop cos she wasnt chained to Stuart, they all took it as a huge laugh.

Adding extra housemate - not worked - Becki voted out at first opportunity.

The bedsit - yes and no, because the housemates sussed out more or less what was happening, although it did result in Day 20 which I dont think they imagined.

But the worst for me was how the producers wimped out over Day 20. To be really evil they should have evicted all the people involved not just Emma and replace them. Now that would have been evil.

Any other views out there?

[rachb]

I voted could be more Evil.
I think they had some good ideas which could have been really good if used on the right person.
What they really need is ME
I could make it really evil
I think past bb has been more evil than this one.

Very evil. Raw fish guts?

I thought some of the editing was pretty nasty too!

[James]

I think the real evil starts when the housemates leave the house and have to deal with the outside world.

That's what Dean said in the book he wrote anyway.

[Mike]

I definately think BB could have been more evil not that he was'nt evil at times though because he was.