[Wizard.]

Should they have removed Biggins for unacceptable behaviour / language? I felt sorry for him not going to lie. Some people don't realise that what they're saying is not right and its up to people to tell them that it's not right not just removing him and ruining his career.

[Lostie!]

Impossible to say if they're not even gonna show the comment to Katie. I don't think it was warranted solely on the basis of the bisexual comments though (as much as I disagreed with them) since just earlier this year a guy made offensive comments about gay people in this VT and they still put him in.

[Drew.]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Impossible to say if they're not even gonna show the comment to Katie. I don't think it was warranted solely on the basis of the bisexual comments though (as much as I disagreed with them) since just earlier this year a guy made offensive comments about gay people in this VT and they still put him in.

this

[Daniel-X]

Originally Posted by Lostie!

Impossible to say if they're not even gonna show the comment to Katie. I don't think it was warranted solely on the basis of the bisexual comments though (as much as I disagreed with them) since just earlier this year a guy made offensive comments about gay people in this VT and they still put him in.

.

[BB247]

Originally Posted by Riley.

Should they have removed Biggins for unacceptable behaviour / language? I felt sorry for him not going to lie. Some people don't realise that what they're saying is not right and its up to people to tell them that it's not right not just removing him and ruining his career.

I'm well vexed.
Should be able to at least talk about anything as long as the person is not preaching hatefulness.

[thisisdanny]

What he said wasn't right. He clearly didn't mean to cause offence though, I felt bad for him when BB was speaking to him. If they've warned him multiple times then it's justifiable. Now wondering how many warnings Bear has gotten away with though...

[Nodplod]

Originally Posted by thisisdanny

What he said wasn't right. He clearly didn't mean to cause offence though, I felt bad for him when BB was speaking to him. If they've warned him multiple times then it's justifiable. Now wondering how many warnings Bear has gotten away with though...

Biggins was victimised. He is a gay man and his language about bisexuality was more 'what has been said' rather than any vilification of any group. It is totally unacceptable that he's been ousted. Disgusted the way BB producers manipulate to keep some of the vile housemates in. And totally ignore vile behaviour/language/content/explicit sexual content. All that is ok, is it BB?
Yet Biggins' comments ( of which we haven't heard ALL) 'justify' his removal.😡
Bear's threatening violent behaviour/language; Aubrey's phenomenally vile act if SPITTING into a sandwich and a drink(and the subsequent laughter and pride at this action ; Renee's agreement in the conversation with Biggins.
It seems the US contestants are over protected. Who can forget the way Perez Hilton was pandered to? His vile outbursts and offensive sexually explicit actions? Was he removed? No!
Watch this space: Bear will be saved from eviction somehow this week. BB will ensure it by some twist. Because they know the public, given the choice, would choose to evict him.
Biggins has been robbed of his experience too early. SPINELESS and MANIPULATIVE, BB producers! You favour Americans and young drunken louts. Feeling let down, big time!!

[Patricia4]

No

[ThriceShy]

Didn't Helen receive 14 warnings for actual abuse and intimidation towards individuals she was living with?

[lovebigbrotheruk]

Originally Posted by ThriceShy

Didn't Helen receive 14 warnings for actual abuse and intimidation towards individuals she was living with?

She was a bigoted idiot as well. She should have been chucked out.

[ThriceShy]

Originally Posted by lovebigbrotheruk

She was a bigoted idiot as well. She should have been chucked out.

But she wasn't. Why the disparity?

[RhysJones]

Yeah, BB said that they've repeatedly spoke to him about his comments, so fair enough

[smudgie]

No.

[Daffodil]

I can't answer this because we have not been told what he said to Katie.

[hot2go]

Originally Posted by Daffodil

I can't answer this because we have not been told what he said to Katie.

So we know he publicly blamed the bisexual.community for spreading the worst killer disease in history but unless he upsets Katie you can't decide if he should have been thrown out or not ?

[zakman440]

It's a very confusing situation tbh. If he built up the warnings then yes, but without seeing the full context as to why & when those warnings were issued it's hard to justify it.

[dyfed]

When it was announced to the hm biggins had gone,Katie was the first to be sad,my question is if Katie had been hurt by any of his comments surely she wouldn't be so sad!!

[Greg!]

No idea tbh they should have showed his conversation with Katie so people could judge whether he deserved to go

[mr rochester]

There is no consistency whatsoever with this weak production team. They spoke about offensive language being the reason they were sacking him. Why then is Unbearable still there? Everything he gibbers from his open chewing mouth is offensive...

[RichardG]

As a viewer I've been much more offended by Bear and his gang than Biggins

Probably just another unfair ejection for the controversy/ratings

[MrAlexFletcher]

Biggins' ejection was for drama and headlines purely! The ratings or reviews mustn't be doing so good. Biggins said some questionable things. Granted. However you have to take into consideration that Renee was an accessory to the Biphobic incident so surely she must've received some form of a repercussion for it. Wouldn't put it past the producers as they clearly deem it acceptable to reveal a housemates ejection without showing the full amount of evidence leading to their exclusion. Shambles!

Personally I feel that we should decide who should live in the house. Katie Hopkins had it right in CBB15. People should be voted out. Not censored out. (obviously if physical violence entered the equation then obviously a housemate should definitely be ejected!)

[BB247]

Originally Posted by MrAlexFletcher

Biggins' ejection was for drama and headlines purely! The ratings or reviews mustn't be doing so good. Biggins said some questionable things. Granted. However you have to take into consideration that Renee was an accessory to the Biphobic incident so surely she must've received some form of a repercussion for it. Wouldn't put it past the producers as they clearly deem it acceptable to reveal a housemates ejection without showing the full amount of evidence leading to their exclusion. Shambles!

Personally I feel that we should decide who should live in the house. Katie Hopkins had it right in CBB15. People should be voted out. Not censored out. (obviously if physical violence entered the equation then obviously a housemate should definitely be ejected!)

I means it's a show for adults, BB is to sensitive just let the HM's get on with it as long as there is no violence or threats of violence.

[jet]

Originally Posted by BB247

I means it's a show for adults, BB is to sensitive just let the HM's get on with it as long as there is no violence or threats of violence.

I agree. Let the public hear the conversations and decide by the public vote whether we find something offensive or not.

[bananarama]

Originally Posted by jet

I agree. Let the public hear the conversations and decide by the public vote whether we find something offensive or not.

The public don't need to hear anything offensive because BB has the power of editing material out. It should be the duty of the program editors to protect the public and only if housemates complain about offensive statements from a fellow housemate should BB then consider eviction or not.

It's more than likely that lawyers are advising what can be aired. Like I said above if they chose not to air any of it then lawyers would not need to be involved.

[Livia]

Originally Posted by bananarama

The public don't need to hear anything offensive because BB has the power of editing material out. It should be the duty of the program editors to protect the public and only if housemates complain about offensive statements from a fellow housemate should BB then consider eviction or not.

It's more than likely that lawyers are advising what can be aired. Like I said above if they chose not to air any of it then lawyers would not need to be involved.

If the comments were as they were reported why the hell would lawyers being involved?