[arista]

All Legal Americans
Are able to Work and Be Happy again.


I am so sorry to put this into simple words
but a lot of you "DO NOT GET IT"

He is Banning Some Extreme Muslims (Not Muslims)
Its a Temporary Order - that's what the Voters wanted

And this is a "USA TERM"
Illegal Aliens are not permitted to be in America.
Check out the UK Rock Band Genesis Song
"Illegal Alien"

Make America Great Again
means the LEFT WING mess
is getting buried 6 Feet Under.
Nothing wrong with that



Please give your views....
This is a Legit Story........


And Young Tibbers
SPEAK YOUR MIND


Sign Of The Times

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by arista

All Legal Americans
Are able to Work and Be Happy again.


I am so sorry to put this into simple words
but a lot of you "DO NOT GET IT"

He is Banning Some Extreme Muslims (Not Muslims)
Its a Temporary Order - that's what the Voters wanted

And this is a "USA TERM"
Illegal Aliens are not permitted to be in America.
Check out the UK Rock Band Genesis Song
"Illegal Alien"

Make America Great Again
means the LEFT WING mess
is getting buried 6 Feet Under.
Nothing wrong with that



Please give your views....
This is a Legit Story........


And Young Tibbers
SPEAK YOUR MIND


Sign Of The Times

If they are illegal he is well within his rights. Extreme Muslims as well as they are a clear threat to everyone. America will be safer without them.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by arista

All Legal Americans
Are able to Work and Be Happy again.


I am so sorry to put this into simple words
but a lot of you "DO NOT GET IT"

He is Banning Some Extreme Muslims (Not Muslims)
Its a Temporary Order - that's what the Voters wanted

And this is a "USA TERM"
Illegal Aliens are not permitted to be in America.
Check out the UK Rock Band Genesis Song
"Illegal Alien"

Make America Great Again
means the LEFT WING mess
is getting buried 6 Feet Under.
Nothing wrong with that



Please give your views....
This is a Legit Story........


And Young Tibbers
SPEAK YOUR MIND


Sign Of The Times

It's not just one federal judge who have issued injunctive orders against enforcement of Trump's new Executive Order about those entering the country; it's now two, one in NYC, and another in Virginia. The federal marshalls, on Trump's new Order, are detaining legal residents, with valid "green cards:. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/…
These federal agents are detaining legal residents of the US, without warrants, with no criminal activity committed in the presence of authority, and without any legally sufficient probable cause to detain these travellers against their will(s). These people are being arrested (in law, detained for any reason by authorities, against the will of the detainee, who is not free to go.

That the US Constitution and Bill of Rights is being flagrantly violated, on the orders of the new President, is self-evident and has immediately resulted in the issuance of federal court orders against enforcement of President Trump's new EO.

All you have done here is to show your complete ignorance of everything - very well done and full marks for that.

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

It's not just one federal judge who have issued injunctive orders against enforcement of Trump's new Executive Order about those entering the country; it's now two, one in NYC, and another in Virginia. The federal marshalls, on Trump's new Order, are detaining legal residents, with valid "green cards:. https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/social-issues/…
These federal agents are detaining legal residents of the US, without warrants, with no criminal activity committed in the presence of authority, and without any legally sufficient probable cause to detain these travellers against their will(s). These people are being arrested (in law, detained for any reason by authorities, against the will of the detainee, who is not free to go.

That the US Constitution and Bill of Rights is being flagrantly violated, on the orders of the new President, is self-evident and has immediately resulted in the issuance of federal court orders against enforcement of President Trump's new EO.

All you have done here is to show your complete ignorance of everything - very well done and full marks for that.

A left-leaning newspaper's hysterical slant on the situation perhaps. Personally I would need to see a more balanced picture of events before making any rash judgements.

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by Brillopad

A left-leaning newspaper's hysterical slant on the situation perhaps. Personally I would need to see a more balanced picture of events before making any rash judgements.

The news is out there... everywhere
Trump has already betrayed the solemn oath he made.

[arista]

[QUOTE=DemolitionRed;9188289]The news is out there... everywhere
Trump has already betrayed the solemn oath he made.[/QUOTE


No its a Temporary Ban

Everyone on the Workers Side
that voted Trump wanted this.]

[DemolitionRed]

double post

[arista]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

double post

DR you can Delete Your Post
you must learn this.

[Crimson Dynamo]

better than sitting on your hands waiting to be attacked

[arista]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

better than sitting on your hands waiting to be attacked

Bang On Right LT.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

better than sitting on your hands waiting to be attacked

It won't prevent that, in fact it'll most likely lead to more violence.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It won't prevent that, in fact it'll most likely lead to more violence.

Any that break USA Laws
will go to Prison
that will Correct them.

By the way Young Kizzy
My Other System
of removing all
drunks/homeless off streets
that was going to
the Former PM
of UK D.C.
will now go direct
to USA.*
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=294081
Posted on tibb Worldwide
by arista member
29th Dec 2015

*In USA there will be slight
changes
so if they are not
on Streets
and not breaking
USA Laws they will not be removed

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

It won't prevent that, in fact it'll most likely lead to more violence.

So we let them hold us to ransom with underlying threats. Do we really want people who do that in our countries? Ffs

And how do you know it won't prevent it - the more people who live in the West who share the same religious beliefs as those who hate the West the more westerners will be at risk. How many quietly support the hate for our countries is unknown.

[DemolitionRed]

Washington State governor blasts Trump: inhumane, illegal, unconstitutional

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q9U...ature=youtu.be

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed

Washington State governor blasts Trump: inhumane, illegal, unconstitutional

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q9U...ature=youtu.be

another greeting face loser who cant get over his fave didnt win

[MB.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

another greeting face loser who cant get over his fave didnt win

Because sitting back and watching millions of innocent people being barred from entering your country, against not just basic human rights principles but the actual Bill of Rights, and allowing Trump to do so because he's the President and there's nothing anyone can do... yeah that's the true spirit of democracy

ps I see Mike Pence hasn't said much about this for somebody who spoke out strongly against the plan when Trump first announced it

[Scarlett.]

Welcome to the so called land of the free.

[Kizzy]

"The Geneva Refugee Convention requires the international community to take in refugees from war on humanitarian grounds. All signatory states are expected to do so. The Chancellor explained this policy to the US President in their call yesterday.'

Wonder when it will be explained to our govt?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7551641.html

[Brillopad]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

"The Geneva Refugee Convention requires the international community to take in refugees from war on humanitarian grounds. All signatory states are expected to do so. The Chancellor explained this policy to the US President in their call yesterday.'

Wonder when it will be explained to our govt?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7551641.html

This should only be on a temporary basis until it is safe for them to go back or gradually be dispersed in safe nearby countries. They are not the permanent responsibility of countries that offer shelter.

[DemolitionRed]

2016 Global Democracy Index downgrades USA from a full democracy to a flawed regime

The Democracy Index is compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit based in the United Kingdom and measures the state of democracy in 167 countries across the Globe.
http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/n...ca-flawed-list

It grades countries on a scale of zero to 10 using 60 indicators across five different categories to classify them as full democracies, flawed democracies, hybrid regimes or authoritarian regimes.
Jamaica has now been joined by the United States which, for the first time in its history, has been downgraded from a full democracy to a flawed regime in the latest survey.

I wonder how much further down the list they will go with Trump at the helm.

[Crimson Dynamo]

cant make an omlette without breaking eggs

No move to combat terrorism will be popular

Look at the child miogrants

there was a wave of people on here defeding them until one killed them people in Germany and then

zip


not a peep



Trump could care less about upsetting a few snowflakes, his job is to protect America not sell records

[Crimson Dynamo]

Britain should follow Donald Trump's lead and introduce 'extreme vetting,' Nigel Farage says as he defends US President's immigration crackdown

• Ex-Ukip leader and friend of Trump defends controversial executive order to prevent anyone entering US from seven Muslim majority countries
• Says President is entitled to introduce measures in bid to crackdown on jihadis
• Blames ban on Angela Merkel's open-door policy towards refugees fleeing Syria

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ation-ban.html

[arista]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Britain should follow Donald Trump's lead and introduce 'extreme vetting,' Nigel Farage says as he defends US President's immigration crackdown

• Ex-Ukip leader and friend of Trump defends controversial executive order to prevent anyone entering US from seven Muslim majority countries
• Says President is entitled to introduce measures in bid to crackdown on jihadis
• Blames ban on Angela Merkel's open-door policy towards refugees fleeing Syria

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ation-ban.html

Yes he understands the Law of the Land
Tip Top

[DemolitionRed]

Originally Posted by arista

Yes he understands the Law of the Land
Tip Top

He's just an opportunist media ***** and a rank hypocrite who does feck all for his money.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Britain should follow Donald Trump's lead and introduce 'extreme vetting,' Nigel Farage says as he defends US President's immigration crackdown

• Ex-Ukip leader and friend of Trump defends controversial executive order to prevent anyone entering US from seven Muslim majority countries
• Says President is entitled to introduce measures in bid to crackdown on jihadis
• Blames ban on Angela Merkel's open-door policy towards refugees fleeing Syria

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ation-ban.html

Oh Nigel.

I see your truuue colours shining through...
I see your truuue colours and that's why ur raaacist
so don't be afraid...
to let them show...
truuuue colours,
truuuuuue colours,
Trumps made it acceptableeeee...
to be a xenophoowww(be).


Quite blatantly his multi-decade drive for Brexit had absolutely nothing to do with trade laws et al. and everything to do with him wanting the borders closed to any "other" who might dare to darken the doors of his quaint whitey-white English football hooligan pubs.