[Kate!]

Dear God no.

[bots]

Thankfully, she will never be queen. I can't remember the correct term, but it will be something like kings consort

[Mokka]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Thankfully, she will never be queen. I can't remember the correct term, but it will be something like kings consort

verb
/kənˈsôrt,ˈkänˌsôrt/
habitually associate with (someone), typically with the disapproval of others

Yeah... that sounds like the right descriptive term for her

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Mokka

verb
/kənˈsôrt,ˈkänˌsôrt/
habitually associate with (someone), typically with the disapproval of others

Yeah... that sounds like the right descriptive term for her

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Thankfully, she will never be queen. I can't remember the correct term, but it will be something like kings consort

She would be Queen Consort.

[joeysteele]

I have doubts as to her getting to be termed it.
Let's see if Prince Charles insists on it however.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I have doubts as to he getting to be termed it.
Let's see if Prince Charles insists on it however.

I think he will. The old goat. Can't stand him.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Kate!

I think he will. The old goat. Can't stand him.

I hope he pushes for her ... he’s unpopular now so she could well be his downfall .. all rather fitting tbh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[LaLaLand]

I have no problem with Camilla whatsoever, she’s one of my fave “Royals” - seems pretty down to Earth and lovely.

And the fact that she rescued a dog from a shelter just makes me like her even more!

[LaLaLand]

I don’t think we will ever see Charles on the throne honestly - he probably doesn’t want the hassle at his age and will pass it on to William. (Imo)

[Kate!]

poll added

[bots]

i'm sure charles will take the throne, it's what he has prepared for all his life. The queen in her 90's has not played a full role for a long, long time, the majority of that work has fallen to charles, so he is already very familiar with what is required.

[Shaun]

If it upsets weirdos with an unhealthy royal obsession or the idea that Diana was a pure spirit who didn't **** around behind his back as well, then sure x

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Shaun

If it upsets weirdos with an unhealthy royal obsession or the idea that Diana was a pure spirit who didn't **** around behind his back as well, then sure x

I don't have a royal obsession but I do believe Diana was 'a pure spirit' yes. I sincerely doubt she cheated on him. Her relationships happened after the split.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Kate!

I don't have a royal obsession but I do believe Diana was 'a pure spirit' yes. I sincerely doubt she cheated on him. Her relationships happened after the split.

I was a big fan of Diana’s, but having affairs with married men who were hurting their wives when she knew how that felt isn’t something a pure spirit would do, more of a flawed spirit really.
But her genuine warmth and compassion made it easy for most of us to overlook her faults and failings which in many ways were due to the lack of true love in her marriage, imo.
Btw, Diana’s affair with the single James Hewitt started in 1986 and ended around 1991, she didn’t split from Charles until 1992, but of course Charles was having his affair with Camilla before and after these dates.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by jet

I was a big fan of Diana’s, but having affairs with married men who were hurting their wives when she knew how that felt isn’t something a pure spirit would do, more of a flawed spirit really.

But her genuine warmth and compassion made it easy for most of us to overlook her faults and failings which in many ways were due to the lack of true love in her marriage, imo.

Btw, Diana’s affair with the single James Hewitt started in 1986 and ended around 1991, she didn’t split from Charles until 1992, but of course Charles was having his affair with Camilla before and after these dates.

... before and after Charlie Boy married Dinas well ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

Originally Posted by Zizu

... before and after Charlie Boy married Dinas well ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Whether Charles continued his affair with Camilla after their marriage is disputed. It is widely accepted (the Andrew Morton book which was aided by Diana) that their affair stopped on marrying Diana and didn't resume until several years later when, as Charles said "the marriage had irretrievably broken down".
However, throughout all this time, Camilla remained his confidante and they were in constant touch which was nearly as bad as far as Diana was concerned.

For those watching, this series of the Crown is really ramping it up for dramatic effect rather than the truth; the fact that the producer is an anti - monarchist tells its own story.

[rusticgal]

I dont have a problem with it at all. I adored Diana and I despised Charles for treating her the way he did...and like most I didnt think highly of Camilla as the 'Other woman'.
However...its quite clear how suited they are as a couple. They wanted to be together long before Diana came on the scene. Camilla has dealt with the situation as the vilified Mistress in a very dignified way over the years..she has kept herself to herself and I believe she has made Charles a better person.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Shaun

If it upsets weirdos with an unhealthy royal obsession or the idea that Diana was a pure spirit who didn't **** around behind his back as well, then sure x

I don't understand why Diana's other relationships get brought up, when we all know her marriage to Charles was long OVER .

The bloke was cheating on her with Camilla, the marriage was a joke to him.

[joeysteele]

I've voted no thanks, from a personal perspective.
However obviously it would have to be accepted if Prince Charles insisted and it was acceptable too likely to Parliament.

[bots]

Charles is flawed, Diana was flawed and Camilla is flawed. However it pans out, it will have zero impact on any of our lives. Thank goodness our fate no longer depends on who is on the hot seat

[Crimson Dynamo]

yes she is a stalwart

[Zizu]

No way !!!

I still can’t believe that she even has the nerve to show her face after her well documented unforgivable behaviour

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[smudgie]

Yes.
She would be the wife of the King.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by smudgie

Yes.

She would be the wife of the King.

Well she’s already been his girlfriend when she was married .. then mistress when they were both married .. she may as well go the whole hog


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro