| FAQ | 
| Members List | 
| Calendar | 
| Search | 
| Today's Posts | 
|  |  | 
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
|  | 
|  30-12-2023, 12:38 AM | #1 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			[Liz Truss announces her 'trimmed' honours list of 11 people including a Tory donor and Brexit campaign chief - despite being Prime Minister for just 49 days] [She nominated life peers including Sir Jon Moynihan, a Conservative party donor, Matthew Elliott, who ran the Brexit campaign in 2016, and Ruth Porter, her deputy chief of staff in No 10.] [Former chief executive of the Vote Leave Brexit Matthew Elliott has been nominated for a peerage by former prime minister Liz Truss, and Tory MP Jacqueline Doyle-Price has been nominated for a damehood.]  Ruth Porter  [Tory donor Sir Jon Moynihan] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...r-49-days.html | |||
|   | 
|  30-12-2023, 09:27 AM | #2 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			Why are the government not taken to task about giving honours out to undeserving people ? It just seems blatantly wrong if not criminal Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro | |||
|   | 
|  30-12-2023, 09:38 AM | #3 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| self-oscillating | 
			
			the honours are a joke and they always have been. No more needs to be said
		 | |||
|   | 
|  30-12-2023, 10:36 AM | #5 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| Senior Member | 
			
			All honours are a complete joke anyway. If it gives some Tory MP the 'right' to call himself a Sir - then Gawd blimey. It's only a word. Crazy. Nobody has any honours in my view. They're all plain the name they were born with. Anyone who wants to bow down to Sirs and Lords, then get a life.   | |||
|   | 
|  30-12-2023, 11:08 AM | #6 | ||
| 
 | |||
| thesheriff443 | 
			
			It’s not what you know it’s who you know And nice work if you can get it | ||
|   | 
|  30-12-2023, 02:06 PM | #7 | ||
| 
 | |||
| Senior Member | 
			
			I don't necessarily take against the idea of a second chamber where laws etc can be scrutinised and bounced back for various reasons. I don't even particularly care that it amounts to a job for life. But should someone who spent less than two months as PM get to choose who gets those seats? 
				__________________    | ||
|   | 
|  30-12-2023, 04:27 PM | #8 | |||
| 
 | ||||
| self-oscillating | Quote: 
 | |||
|   | 
| Register to reply Log in to reply | 
| 
 | 
 |