[Deep2]

Anybody know or want to speculate as to what the penalty will be for Nikki, Lisa, Lea (and grace, but a mute point as she will be gone), discussing the nominations??

I suggest put them all up.
If these people are not allowed to vote though, it could be enough to save Suzi and Richard and be the final nail in the coffin to destroy the remainder of the plastics.

Thoughts??

[GlitterEyes]

I think they should continue the rule of not getting to nominate like they did with Imogen and Sezar. For them to change the rules would be VERY unfair. It is clear that nominations shouldnt be discussed but they don't learn at all. It is only fair that they miss nominations and not change the rules to suit who bb want to stay/go.

I think bb even making them wait is rather unfair because they have a chance to swop and change things on how the week pans out. It should be one rule for them all no exceptions.

[Mike]

Yeah BB should just stick with the not letting them nominate idea.

I'm suprised people havent learnt their lesson to be honest what with the amount of people banned so far.

[GlitterEyes]

It seems to be all girls aswell once they get nattering they forget to stop with the exception of Sezar.

[Deep2]

I think they should ALL go up next week. It would be intriguing to see who the least popular housemate is in there...Lisa perhaps?

[Psylocke]

Lisa or mikey would go if they were all up....the Really boring ones

[GlitterEyes]

I dont think its fair to punish them all. Plus the fact that it will change the rules they have already put on the table. They did that last time with maxwell and saskia or ant and that was really unfair. Once they set the limits they should continue to enforce that rule throughout otherwise they are having their favorites.

[NateJ]

Originally posted by GlitterEyes
For them to change the rules would be VERY unfair.

Sure you have been watching the same BB as the rest of us have been this year? Fair - like this weeks nommies?

[GlitterEyes]

The nominations this week was a twist. Nothing wrong with that. I mean for them to stop Sezar and Imogen from nominating for chatting about it then when lisa and co talked not enforcing the same rules on them would be unfair.

[EmilyJ]

A twist is one way of looking at it. Huge con is another. BB has favourites. BB chooses who wins. You decide, don't kid yourself.

[abs]

the UK BB is c**p, its all about the US BB...

http://www.cbs.com/primetime/bigbrother2/

the public have no influence whats so ever, nominations & evictions are done by the HMs themselves! the US version is a proper compitition, ie the HMs go in the house wanting to win the prize, by any means... that way, BB cant punish the HMs for talking about nominations etc because you can talk about it. people like grace, sezer, lisa, derek, science etc would do well in the US version

[abs]

[Foebane100]

I think their punishment is that they were told they've been naughty and that is it.

[bonnie43uk]

Lisa was looking petrified when BB was speaking to her about nommys' .. i say ban them from nominating, maybe Lisa will learn her lesson. ... but she probably wont, with her big gob.

[Deep2]

that can't be it, as BB said they would get back to the little gob-shite.

[abs]

Originally posted by Deep2
that can't be it, as BB said they would get back to the little gob-shite.

lol

[Lance]

What happened to the three strikes they used to have?