Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrilliantOne
Pretty much all housemates were entertaining that year. Even on night 1, there was an argument in the bedroom! Best series to date.
|
Yes, there was an argument on the first night, however, this does not make it the best series based on the first night alone? You do not speak on behalf of everyone when you say it’s the best series, many regard BB5 as the best and BB7 was awarded best series earlier this year. While BB6 may have been good it is not widely considered the best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrilliantOne
It's an informed opinion.
|
A very biased opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrilliantOne
That doesn't prove anything. Even only 100 voters phoning in with 51 voting one way and 49 the other leaves a 1% voting percentage between them.
Your analysis is flawed and needs revising.
|
But we’re not talking about 100 people, 3,539,683 voted for Craig to win. That’s a hell of a lot of votes and with only a 2% difference it proves they were both popular for their time. And again, the BB1-4 HMs were a different kind of HM to nowadays but it doesn’t mean they should be written off as ‘dull’.
I think
your analysis is flawed and needs revising, Dear.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrilliantOne
Wrong. BB 2005 had to up their game after so many boring contestants (and I'm pretty sure a big ratings dip) from the year before. BB 2005 brought all the loud, bombastic HM's in an effort to make it flourish. And flourish it did!
|
No. BB5 (2004) did not suffer a ratings dip, its average was 5.1 million over BB4’s 4.6 million, which that was a dip after BB3’s 5.8 million. The reason BB5 pulled in bigger characters was because BB4’s theme was ‘back to basics’ and had a noticeable lack of big characters, and it wasn’t successful. Although they were more ‘normal’ in BBs 1-3 they were still picked as potentially interesting and larger than life people e.g. Nichola and after the Natsy Nick scandal the producers purposely picked bigger characters like Brian and Helen to ‘up the ante’, and then in BB5 they started putting in people who were bound to clash (which BB4 lacked). BB6 applied this, it didn’t start it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBrilliantOne
I'm sorry, but those 'moments' were dull. Fight Night was the exception, but Nadia's role was secondary really. Victor and Emma were the real stars of that particular episode. Plus, even before and after Fight Night, Victor and Emma were much better HMs than Nadia was.
|
Again, this is simply your opinion. You’re not alone in you’re opinion, but you’re speaking as if it were fact. Of course Nadia’s role was secondary compared to Victor and Emma, but she was still involved and more active than the likes of Shell.
16-08-2010, 06:51 PM
Linear Mode
