[icecakes]

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view...T-COWELL-BACK/

[armand.kay]

I don't understand why is it that she agreed to keep silent.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I don't understand why is it that she agreed to keep silent.

She would't have had a choice I don't think.

[Jord]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I don't understand why is it that she agreed to keep silent.

She doesn't have a choice.

[reece(:]

But she didn't confirm or deny anything she only discussed what the articles said

[icecakes]

She could go to jail

[Mrluvaluva]

That link does not work for me?

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by JH95

She would't have had a choice I don't think.

What! Don't she have freedom of speech or something. It does not seem right that Mr Cowell can just have his legal team shut her up.

[Smithy]

page not found

[icecakes]

Try this one http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

What! Don't she have freedom of speech or something. It does not seem right that Mr Cowell can just have his legal team shut her up.

I think its fantastic.. I'm ****ing sick of girls who make their money from shagging celebs then selling their story. I mean, who the **** is interested what Simon Cowell is like in bed?

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

What! Don't she have freedom of speech or something. It does not seem right that Mr Cowell can just have his legal team shut her up.

High paid celebs always do it, Ryan Giggs done it.

[swinearefine]

What happens if she breaks it I would just ignore it, that's a violation of freedom of speech

[Red Moon]

Given that the Daily Star has commercial interests in Channel Five it probably just a way of getting more people to watch Big Brother and read the newspaper.

Just a thought

[icecakes]

Originally Posted by swinearefine

What happens if she breaks it I would just ignore it, that's a violation of freedom of speech

Cowells lawyers have had a judge put a gagging order on her,if she breaks it she could go to jail.

[tweetypiebabe1]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

What! Don't she have freedom of speech or something. It does not seem right that Mr Cowell can just have his legal team shut her up.

The technical term is an injunction I believe so basically high profile celebrities, moguls, men in general can get these gagging orders against the women stopping them from exposing what has gone down.

This could be a way to protect reputation, family life but most importantly money. It's disgusting.

Never mind the women exploiting the men for their money, because neither party is innocent in the matter, but you need to look at those men who have families, wives, kids. Disgusting.

[Omah]

Originally Posted by Red Moon

Given that the Daily Star has commercial interests in Channel Five it probably just a way of getting more people to watch Big Brother and read the newspaper.

Just a thought

Exactly - anything "leaked" from the now highly-edited BB is obviously a deliberate ploy .....

[Red Moon]

Originally Posted by Omah

Exactly - anything "leaked" from the now highly-edited BB is obviously a deliberate ploy .....

Especially if it is in the Daily Star!

I think people have to remember the commercial connections between the two companies and not read too much into what is published in that particular newspaper these days.

The same could have been said about The Sun when they were the official Big Brother newspaper, except they were rather better at reporting the truth, and the occasional rumour which they paid good money for (not mentioning any forum members names...lol)

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by Lee.

I think its fantastic.. I'm ****ing sick of girls who make their money from shagging celebs then selling their story. I mean, who the **** is interested what Simon Cowell is like in bed?

So all human rights should be thrown out the window to protect some ****ing man slut who is unable to stay loyal.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

So all human rights should be thrown out the window to protect some ****ing man slut who is unable to stay loyal.

It takes two to tango btw.

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by JH95

It takes two to tango btw.

I never said otherwise.

[JTM45]

Jasmine's a dirty, cheap, cheating slut.

When she shagged Cowell he was in a relationship and she was also in a relationship.

And she thinks she has the right to question someone else's morality ? She's deluded as well as cheap! (and pig ugly to boot)

[swinearefine]

Originally Posted by JTM45

Jasmine's a dirty, cheap, cheating slut.

When she shagged Cowell he was in a relationship and she was also in a relationship.

And she thinks she has the right to question someone else's morality ? She's deluded as well as cheap! (and pig ugly to boot)

You don't know the details of the situation. The world isn't black-and-white.

[JTM45]

The world certainly isn't black and white but Jasmine clearly is a cheap *****!

[reece(:]

Originally Posted by JTM45

Jasmine's a dirty, cheap, cheating slut.

When she shagged Cowell he was in a relationship and she was also in a relationship.

And she thinks she has the right to question someone else's morality ? She's deluded as well as cheap! (and pig ugly to boot)

What on Earth has this got to do with discussion of the gagging order, just seems like continued unnecessary hate..