[jaxie]

Is it only me who gets irritated when Big Brother hype us up with a public nomination then have a stupid task to rob the public choice? Why get us all to poll and then take the decision away?

Isaac will probably now just coast to the final. Public shafted.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by jaxie

Is it only me who gets irritated when Big Brother hype us up with a public nomination then have a stupid task to rob the public choice? Why get us all to poll and then take the decision away?

Isaac will probably now just coast to the final. Public shafted.

but the public knew what the vote was for and knew that the hm could still be saved before they voted.

[bots]

Eventually the public one will end up in the eviction. Also, it breeds suspicion in the house mates .... who voted for me ... what did I do wrong etc etc .... Also, it's a possible method of getting the likes of Sian out

[BBDodge]

They tried to appeal to fans who were fed up with radar-dodgers drifting though to the final.

It didn't work this time and Isaac isn't a radar-dodger anyway.

The big flaw is that the radar-dodger is likely to be the one saved. You will still end up with the major players in the eviction vote unless they win the task and save themselves.

[Elliot]

All of this cast would be radar dodgers in any other series so it’s nothing special. I just really wish we could get sian and the like out already since they add nothing to an already bleak situation

[Slevin]

i thought the HM who wins if they chose to save someone should have to replace that HM as well. what a bunch of soft pussy bs that turned out to be.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Slevin

i thought the HM who wins if they chose to save someone should have to replace that HM as well. what a bunch of soft pussy bs that turned out to be.

it depends how many are naturally up. This week there were 3 tied for the third spot so we got to pick out of those 3 basically. If one was outright in 3rd spot, the replace comes into play then (at least thats how i think it works )

[Slevin]

nah like any other BB they just make it up how they want lol

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by jaxie

Is it only me who gets irritated when Big Brother hype us up with a public nomination then have a stupid task to rob the public choice? Why get us all to poll and then take the decision away?

Isaac will probably now just coast to the final. Public shafted.

I agree completely.

What a waste of time on the viewers part this all turned out to be.

[Babayaro.]

It's not too big a deal because no money was spent. Instead, it was just an online poll vote.

[Beso]

The vote was more about saving your favourite from eviction anyway, it had nothing to do with most hated or anything connected to that.

[rionablue]

Originally Posted by jaxie

Is it only me who gets irritated when Big Brother hype us up with a public nomination then have a stupid task to rob the public choice? Why get us all to poll and then take the decision away?

Isaac will probably now just coast to the final. Public shafted.

I hope to GOD not. He is an arrogant horrible man

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by parmnion

The vote was more about saving your favourite from eviction anyway, it had nothing to do with most hated or anything connected to that.

It was both.
It was even called by BB the public's choice to be up for eviction.
As to who was the least popular in said vote.

So although no money was spent, peoples time was wasted.
Just a pointless exercise all through in my opinion.

The task was then farcical, then the original housemates choices, not the public's left in place anyway at the end of it all.

All that time taken to end up back at square one anyway.
Daft, plain daft I think.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

It was both.
It was even called by BB the public's choice to be up for eviction.
As to who was the least popular in said vote.

So although no money was spent, peoples time was wasted.
Just a pointless exercise all through in my opinion.

The task was then farcical, then the original housemates choices, not the public's left in place anyway at the end of it all.

All that time taken to end up back at square one anyway.
Daft, plain daft I think.

I'm not sure how many times people could vote or if they could vote for more than one, but for all we know people could have voted Cameron as their favourite but they could have Isaac as their 2nd favourite so the vote, in my opinion wasn't and couldn't be accurate.

[user104658]

This is why they made it "vote to save your favourite", not "nominate your least favourite". Technically, everyone who voted in the poll DID save their favourite, so it wasn't "fraudulent". It is a load of BS though. It's also why they made it a free poll. If they were going to do a legitimate, no questions asked "public's nomination" they would make it a paid vote.