[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Alf

You're correct, that is exactly what I'm saying. Finally you understand me.

You seriously think that? Personally I'm not 100% sure on silencing her views on Social Media (even if those views are abhorrent to me) but I can understand why Twitter initially banned her more than I can understand her picking on a child and mocking her Autism.

The one was a company trying to protect it's image, the other made one of her worst comments that I've personally ever heard her make about someone.

I get that you're pro freedom of speech though Alf.

[GoldHeart]

As I've said many times the term "freedom of speech" gets abused constantly.

Gargoyles like that spout nothing but hate ,but like to hide behind "I'm just being honest " BS .

[arista]

A New Tweet from Katie

[Marsh.]

This is what happens when the unemployed have too much time on their hands. They make embarrassing twitter videos.

[arista]

[GoldHeart]

The gargoyle is playing victim now . Can she sink any lower , she actually expects to be protected when she vomits out hateful abuse on a daily basis ! .

[Withano]

Youre all snowflakes if you find me offensive

Okay that’s enough, you pointed at me, I’m leaving and how dare you

[Alf]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

The gargoyle is playing victim now . Can she sink any lower , she actually expects to be protected when she vomits out hateful abuse on a daily basis ! .

Apparently, you can't call her a Gargoyle, I think that's what people mean by hate speech.

Although, I think Katie Hopkins is fair game, although I'm not sure, I don't make the rules.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Jessica.

You are literally saying that mocking an autistic child, for example, which she did this month, is not as bad as wanting someone with thoughts like that to keep it to themselves.

Let people condemn themselves with their own words. The fricking BNP actually had several council seats until Peter Griffin went on Question Time, and everyone saw what he and the party actually are, and they evaporated. With virtually everything she says, Hopkins is a)limiting future media opportunities and b)making it harder to get a "normal" job when her outragebux run out.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Let people condemn themselves with their own words. The fricking BNP actually had several council seats until Peter Griffin went on Question Time, and everyone saw what he and the party actually are, and they evaporated. With virtually everything she says, Hopkins is a)limiting future media opportunities and b)making it harder to get a "normal" job when her outragebux run out.

Peter Griffin on Question time? I'd watch that episode.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Alf

Peter Griffin on Question time? I'd watch that episode.

wtf xD whatever his name was, who cares. Let's just say Mr Griffin.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Alf

Apparently, you can't call her a Gargoyle, I think that's what people mean by hate speech.

Although, I think Katie Hopkins is fair game, although I'm not sure, I don't make the rules.

Then she shouldn't be so vile and nasty , and it's funny how she can say what she likes but nobody can criticise her??!! . This is the same person that Called Greta Thunberg " an autistic wench" . Isn't she smart picking on a child ??! .

[Oliver_W]

One of her own children is autistic, so you'd think she'd be more careful with her words.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

One of her own children is autistic, so you'd think she'd be more careful with her words.

Watch her thinking, do you mean?

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

One of her own children is autistic, so you'd think she'd be more careful with her words.

When has she ever been careful with her words , every time she opens her mouth it's toxic waste that comes out .

She's also apparently epileptic herself yet still called epileptics "weirdo's" , she's the biggest vile hypocrite ever ! .

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Alf

Watch her thinking, do you mean?

No, not at all, as far as I'm concerned she can say and think what she wants unless she tried to provoke violence. Otherwise, words shouldn't be regulated, and thoughts definitely should not be.

But mocking someone for being autistic is a bit too close to home.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

She's also apparently epileptic herself yet still called epileptics "weirdo's" , she's the biggest vile hypocrite ever ! .

Meh, I have depression and (possibly, undiagnosed) ADHD but I call others with them weirdos But I do it in a loving and flippant way, there's no bile.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

No, not at all, as far as I'm concerned she can say and think what she wants unless she tried to provoke violence. Otherwise, words shouldn't be regulated, and thoughts definitely should not be.

But mocking someone for being autistic is a bit too close to home.

So would it be fine to mock a person who isn't autistic, if they were doing what Greta is doing?

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Alf

So would it be fine to mock a person who isn't autistic, if they were doing what Greta is doing?

It's fine to mock anyone. But when Katie has an autistic child at home, who might be offended by such words, she might want to be careful.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

It's fine to mock anyone. But when Katie has an autistic child at home, who might be offended by such words, she might want to be careful.

Also you better believe she'd have a problem if someone else mocked her child like that , how must Greta feel and her family to hear this said about her??.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Also you better believe she'd have a problem if someone else mocked her child like that , how must Greta feel and her family to hear this said about her??.

Well, quite. Like I said I'm not gonna advocate for speech limitations, but I definitely think people should try each other's shoes on once in a while.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Also you better believe she'd have a problem if someone else mocked her child like that , how must Greta feel and her family to hear this said about her??.

Greta is fine, she's raking it in, she's a con artist.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Alf

Greta is fine, she's raking it in, she's a con artist.

How exactly is she a con artist ? , she's a child trying to make a difference.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Well, quite. Like I said I'm not gonna advocate for speech limitations, but I definitely think people should try each other's shoes on once in a while.

If Hopkins can't take any criticism then she should leave social media and get off the TV , and get a proper job where she doesn't attack people verbally.

But nooo she won't do that as she's a parasite that thrives on her victims pound of flesh. Yet her precious ego can't handle it when she gets it back.

[arista]