[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by Alf

In a Katie Hopkins thread, she would receive as much negative criticism as Meghan, but her threads don't go on for days and days. Why is that?

Because nobody would defend Katie whereas Meghan is very loved.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Because nobody would defend Katie whereas Meghan is very loved.

So in other words, people who agree with Katie Hopkins just allow other members to negatively criticise her, whereas people who agree with Meghan don't allow people to negatively criticise her?

Maybe that's where the root of the problem lays?

I'm just brainstorming.

[Parmy]

If meghan markle shuts down tibb, I may resort to threats of violence...

Begins list

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by Josy

Let's be honest here, a lot of members would be on long bans if we took things more seriously because that would include posts to others in threads that say things like 'die' which has happened plenty and when acted on we get the usual 'oh it was just a joke'

It's all selective to members depending on who posts what and who it's aimed at.

Saying “die” isn’t really a death threat though (IMO) whereas I will do x/y/a is a lot more sinister

[Parmy]

So you just need to use the hip and trendy jokey words that are associated with lazy, and not allowed on tibb chat anyway due to them not allowing txt speak, words.

That's a bit unfair on its older members imo.

[Smithy]

Also I don’t like the ignore function half the people I have on there are dead :/

[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by Alf

So in other words, people who agree with Katie Hopkins just allow other members to negatively criticise her, whereas people who agree with Meghan don't allow people to negatively criticise her?

Maybe that's where the root of the problem lays?

I'm just brainstorming.

No i meant Katie is nowhere near as loved as Meghan therefore only a few would defend Katie. Hence why Meghan threads go on so long. She's marmite but has a lot of love.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Also I don’t like the ignore function half the people I have on there are dead :/

Yeah, you had all the nicer members that have ever been on tibb on ignore, that does explain a lot.

[Holly Christmas]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yeah, you had all the nicer members that have ever been on tibb on ignore, that does explain a lot.

In your opinion Parm.

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by parmnion

Yeah, you had all the nicer members that have ever been on tibb on ignore, that does explain a lot.

Careful or I’ll add you to the list

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Careful or I’ll add you to the list

me and Parm are bullet proof, you can't kill us off

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by Kate!

In your opinion Parm.

Have you seen all the lovely people that have ever been tibb members who have sadly passed away? You can find them in tibbs remembrance section if you havnt..


There is a chance smithy only has 2 people on ignore, and is not being horrible for the sake of it...

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by parmnion

I was wondering about that as well...

Nobody has sent me msgs...

I shall send you one now so you don't miss out

[Parmy]

My suggestion is..

If peope annoy you, put them on ignore.

If you like the annoyance cause it gives you a reason to keep posting, then don't.