[Kate!]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

france deserved the win

Well let's face they had an extra player in the ref.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Kate!

Well let's face they had an extra player in the ref.

thats not true, VAR was also there to make sure the decision was correct

[Swan]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

thats not true, VAR was also there to make sure the decision was correct

Nah sorry, so many decisions went against us. Both were clear pens.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

thats not true, VAR was also there to make sure the decision was correct

The decision was NOT correct. We should've have a other penalty. Sniff.

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

What a miss from Kane.

They wanted Gary Lineker, they got Chris Waddle.

[Calderyon]

Better team won.

[Swan]

Did they though? England had more chances. I feel it was 50/50. Deserved ET

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Calderyon

Better team won.

Disagree completely. It was daylight robbery.

[Mystic Mock]

If the Referee wasn't so criminally awful, we'd be going to extra time right now.

Although being fair to France, I do honestly believe that they just beat the toughest opponents for themselves in the competition.

I honestly don't think that the other three teams will get the Referee getting his Pom Poms out as much as we did today.

[rusticgal]

I’m sorry but the ref was a disgrace…

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

boom, france are more clinical

France had 12 men on the pitch.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I’m sorry but the ref was a disgrace…

He was, not excuses, neutrals hate England so of course they're say otherwise. But it was pretty clear.

[UserSince2005]

So glad this is done. Thank you France.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

thats not true, VAR was also there to make sure the decision was correct

It is true.

VAR even failed to give the penalty that we should've had in the first half, plus France's first goal should've been disallowed because of Saka being fouled beforehand.

The officiating was completely biased towards France.

[Calderyon]

Originally Posted by Swan

Did they though? England had more chances. I feel it was 50/50. Deserved ET

Kane's fault.

He got a chance to equalize the match and missed spectacularly.

[Zizu]

Look we had a far , far stronger bench ..

Why not bring on 4 subs .. fresh legs when it was 1:1 ?

They had no decent subs to bring on …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

grealish is always poor for england

He was our best player in his first five England games ..

Have you conveniently forgotten his performance against Germany ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

mbappe is going to be the difference

He was on the periphery if everything.
Dembele was far better on the night as I suggested before the game

Greizman ran the show


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Swan

He was, not excuses, neutrals hate England so of course they're say otherwise. But it was pretty clear.

Exactly.

If people actually judge the match on what actually happened and not on which team that they like more, they'll see that England should've had a penalty in the first half, and France's first goal should've been disallowed because of the foul on Saka up the other end of the pitch.

These are facts of what happened in the game, and considering France only won narrowly, to say that it didn't make a difference, or that France deserved the win is just not true.

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Exactly.

If people actually judge the match on what actually happened and not on which team that they like more, they'll see that England should've had a penalty in the first half, and France's first goal should've been disallowed because of the foul on Saka up the other end of the pitch.

These are facts of what happened in the game, and considering France only won narrowly, to say that it didn't make a difference, or that France deserved the win is just not true.

Very well said.

[bots]

there are contentious decisions in every match, it is football. Players and fans need to accept that not everyone sees marginal things the same way

[Swan]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Exactly.

If people actually judge the match on what actually happened and not on which team that they like more, they'll see that England should've had a penalty in the first half, and France's first goal should've been disallowed because of the foul on Saka up the other end of the pitch.

These are facts of what happened in the game, and considering France only won narrowly, to say that it didn't make a difference, or that France deserved the win is just not true.

Yeah, all what you say is true. People get fed up with the hype surrounding England in British Isles. But at least one team constantly makes it the tournaments and does well.

The Scots and the Welsh will be celebrating like they won the world cup tonight, after England's exit. Ironic really, Scotland didn't make it, and the only team worse than Wales was Qatar, which is just plain embarrassing. Wales didn't even score an goal from open play, Qatar did.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

there are contentious decisions in every match, it is football. Players and fans need to accept that not everyone sees marginal things the same way

Saka and Kane were blatantly fouled though.

And are we seriously gonna act like the Referee wasn't giving everything to France? The second penalty had to go to VAR because the Referee "didn't see it" apparently.

[Swan]

Anyway, im off to lick my wounds and gorge on soar grapes

[bots]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Saka and Kane were blatantly fouled though.

And are we seriously gonna act like the Referee wasn't giving everything to France? The second penalty had to go to VAR because the Referee "didn't see it" apparently.