FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
[The city’s new “Democracy Voucher”
program, the first of its kind in the US, provides every eligible Seattle resident with $100 in taxpayer-funded vouchers to donate to the candidates of their choice. The goal is to incentivize candidates to take heed of a broad range of residents – homeless people, minimum-wage workers, seniors on fixed incomes – as well as the big-dollar donors who often dictate the political conversation.] Philosopher/Writer Daniel Chandler was on Politics Live BBC2HD today debating this USA Political trial I could see this work in the UK £100 Voucher to the MP you like. In Scotland, Kate Forbes would win in this Last edited by arista; 24-04-2023 at 01:43 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
|
|||
-
|
Surely the idea is to use the vouchers to fund people who would otherwise not have the resources to run at all - not to give it all to already-established politicians
![]() I think it's basically a good idea for a democracy - but there should be rules about who can receive the vouchers. As I said... should be newbies only (and not ones who are already rich). I wouldn't make it "financially deprived only" necessarily, I'd allow it for businesspeople and people on otherwise decent incomes, but with a sensible cut-off point for people who could obviously self-fund their campaign. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
But this has replaced the old system. So the Winner is the one who got the most vouchers, in Seattle. Not some already rich senator. The one that the Public prefer. This about Trust Last edited by arista; 24-04-2023 at 01:57 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|