[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s probably saying the guy did nothing wrong because he’s not the one that had the affair or betrayed anybodies trust

No he said he is totally innocent

[arista]

Matt working in a Pub

His story is best to come out in the Guardian

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s probably saying the guy did nothing wrong because he’s not the one that had the affair or betrayed anybodies trust

Well he lied along with Schofield...

[arista]

[Caroline Flack’s mother criticises ITV
over Phillip Schofield departure
Broadcaster treats on-screen talent as ‘commodities’ and
‘learned nothing’ from her daughter’s death,
she has said]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...P=share_btn_tw



I do not see Flack
in the same way.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Youtube video

Very unprofessional. And embarrassing to boot.

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Well he lied along with Schofield...

And? He’s not the one who had the affair, the responsibility isn’t on him, that’s what I feel Schofe was referring to

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

There's an interview with the perceived young man from This Morning where he's talking to Schofield.
Obviously very friendly at that time.
No doubt on that.

The line that concerns me at the end.
Is when the young man asks him about say 3 years on what will he be doing.
Schofield answers with no hesitation.
If he's still getting away with it he'll be happy.

Getting away with what exactly ?

It meant likely little or nothing at that time but now at least has lights lighting up if not have them flashing, ..... yet.

Yes, it should definitely be investigated. The guy was 15, that's underage in itself.
But he has known him since he was 10. That's the part that worries me.

[Santa's NaughtiNess]

I don't agree with this trial by media.
If he's broken the law the police hopefully will deal with it.
I hate to see this story front page everyday. It's a bit too much.
The so called journalists have no respect for that poor lad or Philip wife and kids.
Those are the ones I really feel for.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

I don't agree with this trial by media.
If he's broken the law the police hopefully will deal with it.
I hate to see this story front page everyday. It's a bit too much.
The so called journalists have no respect for that poor lad or Philip wife and kids.
Those are the ones I really feel for.

Its not on the front page of todays Telegraph, Times, Guardian, I, Star, FT

If it is on the others its because the readers of those papers want to read about it

Journalists just reflect the appetites of their readers

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Still waiting for actual allegations of abuse and grooming…

You guys said it would be soon

Glenn are you actually thick or are you just playing thick?

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by parmnion

They are only odious and unpleasant because you dont agree with their harsh criticisms of things. What Schofield has done is criminal, nasty and vindictive.No way does it compare to those peoples opinions they have on subject matters.

I bet if you did a poll and lumped Eamon Holmes , Piers Morgan and Katie Hopkins together and then got people to vote either pleasant or unpleasant.. 95% would say they are odious and unpleasant..

Nothing to do with the Schofield case .. they’ve just added to their unpleasantness as regards that instance.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Youtube video

[Merry Mockmas]

Originally Posted by arista

[Caroline Flack’s mother criticises ITV
over Phillip Schofield departure
Broadcaster treats on-screen talent as ‘commodities’ and
‘learned nothing’ from her daughter’s death,
she has said]

https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...P=share_btn_tw



I do not see Flack
in the same way.

Well tbf the Media are treating Schofield like he is a criminal, even though he hasn't been charged with anything... Yet.

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Well tbf the Media are treating Schofield like he is a criminal, even though he hasn't been charged with anything... Yet.

I don't think be did commit a crime, I'm fairly confident he waited until MM was legal.

Grooming itself isn't technically a crime, and that's the thing for which he's been accused.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Well tbf the Media are treating Schofield like he is a criminal, even though he hasn't been charged with anything... Yet.

No "they" are not. They are reporting on the information that is available.

Are you saying BBC 1,2 are?

Are Channel 4 or ITV?

The Times/Guardian/Telegraph/Mail/I/Mirror?

BBC Radio 1,2,3,4?

Commercial Radio like LBC/Talk/Times?


Who specifically do you mean and let's see an example

[Liam-]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Well tbf the Media are treating Schofield like he is a criminal, even though he hasn't been charged with anything... Yet.

He’s being treated like a criminal despite not even being actually accused of anything

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s being treated like a criminal despite not even being actually accused of anything illegal

Fixed

[Christmas Dynasnow]

how do you treat a celeb like a criminal anyway

what is the process here?

I have not seen any photoshop pics with Schofield in a orange outfit with leg-chains

[Cherry Christmas]

the interview was car crash, no mention of Steph, think she has finally decided enough is enough, guilt tripping his daughters into standing by his side or he would top himself, made light of the affair, just a casual fling 4 or 5 times in his dressing room, Matthew was obviously infatuated and was slung aside when Phil came to his senses, not sure about the dressing room either, didnt he arrive via Taxi to the studio from Phils home on Fridays, no responsibility taken as an adult male in his 50s taking advantage of a starry eyed youngster


The questions ITV have to answer is why Matthew was 'promoted' to LW
Why did he leave and why was he paid to leave....

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Cherie

the interview was car crash, no mention of Steph, think she has finally decided enough is enough, guilt tripping his daughters into standing by his side or he would top himself, made light of the affair, just a casual fling 4 or 5 times in his dressing room, Matthew was obviously infatuated and was slung aside when Phil came to his senses, not sure about the dressing room either, didnt he arrive via Taxi to the studio from Phils home on Fridays, no responsibility taken as an adult male in his 50s taking advantage of a starry eyed youngster


The questions ITV have to answer is why Matthew was 'promoted' to LW
Why did he leave and why was he paid to leave....

he started with 4-5 times and then changed it to 5-6

absolute full of sh1t everyword out of his mouth

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Cherie

the interview was car crash, no mention of Steph, think she has finally decided enough is enough, guilt tripping his daughters into standing by his side or he would top himself, made light of the affair, just a casual fling 4 or 5 times in his dressing room, Matthew was obviously infatuated and was slung aside when Phil came to his senses, not sure about the dressing room either, didnt he arrive via Taxi to the studio from Phils home on Fridays, no responsibility taken as an adult male in his 50s taking advantage of a starry eyed youngster


The questions ITV have to answer is why Matthew was 'promoted' to LW
Why did he leave and why was he paid to leave....

Poor Steph…very little empathy shown for this lady in his interview.

[Father Chris Mouse]

Originally Posted by Liam-

He’s being treated like a criminal despite not even being actually accused of anything

Omg Liam, yes, in theory he's not broke the law, but he did groom that boy, plain to see.

You're defending him for ONE reason, and that's because he's gay. No way on earth would you be like this if Morgan, Trump etc did the same thing.

I agree we should just let Philip be now, but come on. Gay or not, he's snidey person. And a predator.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Poor Steph…very little empathy shown for this lady in his interview.

Dead right rusticgal.

He's done himself no favours with that interview.
I think he held more back than what he revealed.

He's still paying for the lads lawyers too.
On what agenda are the conditions for that is the question I'd be asking.
Or is it while he's paying for them, the lad cannot say a single thing.
There's an ever increasing bad smell around this.

[Holly Christmas]

He's only bothered about himself. It's so transparent. It's all damage control as he sees it. He must think the public are stupid. Pathetic.

[Rustic bauble]

Originally Posted by Kate!

He's only bothered about himself. It's so transparent. It's all damage control as he sees it. He must think the public are stupid. Pathetic.

Yup I agree….