[Liam-]

[Christmas Dynasnow]

[Zizu]

https://twitter.com/goldenbrown234/s...hADTQG3kMIaXcg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Father Chris Mouse]

I think he's scum, but it's funny how Liam is leading the witch hunt on a guy because he isn't left wing, or a LGBTQABC+ ally, yet when Schofield shagged a child, he was "innocent" and defended. Dan Wootton hasn't been found to have broken the law, yet, just like Schofield didn't technically. It just shows how hypocritical you are really.

But who knows if Dan is guilty, he probably is, i can't stand the bloke.

[Zizu]

He’s getting slaughtered on Digital Spy ..

https://forums.digitalspy.com/discus...news-news/p825


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

Last Night
many guests not having any problem
with his show
Live Monday to Thursday 9PM
GBnewsHD

[bots]

they get paid to be on, why would they

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

they get paid to be on, why would they

Yes
but none are refusing to go on his show.


This thread Title
Claims Rape?


Not on any Front Pages?


Just Liam or Glenn.

[bots]

we will see in the course of time whats true and whats not

[Liam-]

[Christmas Dynasnow]

"I know it’s quite rightly making quite a splash."

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Interesting to note that the Professor has now deleted his 22/7/23 dated , tweet of support !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Zizu]

Byline expose

Part 5

https://bylinetimes.com/2023/07/28/m...s-and-the-bbc/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Christmas Dynasnow]

F me part 5 and no one cares except this 2 man hard left blog



🤡

[Zizu]

Interesting !!!

https://youtu.be/HJJb-DozMR4


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Christmas Dynasnow]

its not

[Tinsel Toes]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Interesting !!!

https://youtu.be/HJJb-DozMR4


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Not really , repetition from same tools.

[Liam-]

It just goes to show how hypocritical these rags are, knowing they’re actively protecting someone accused of awful, heinous, sexually criminal things, while trying to ruin other peoples lives and careers and targeting organisations with accusations of the things they’re doing themselves, absolute shambles

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Liam-

It just goes to show how hypocritical these rags are, knowing they’re actively protecting someone accused of awful, heinous, sexually criminal things, while trying to ruin other peoples lives and careers and targeting organisations with accusations of the things they’re doing themselves, absolute shambles

why haven't the left leaning papers picked it up do you suppose?

[The Slim Reaper]

I don't like Dan Wooton, but funny how Liam ran Scofield's paedophile ring for him.

[jet]

Seen this posted elsewhere taken from a site called ‘Votewatch’, which the poster credits as a reputable source….

IS THE BYLINE TIMES A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE NEWS OUTLET?

The short answer is no. The Byline Times has a history of printing false information and politically-motivated smear pieces.
More concerningly, the Byline Times has been successfully sued multiple times, including on one occasion for publishing false information relating to sexual abuse allegations.
In 2017, regulatory body Impress, of which the Byline Times was a member, ruled that its journalists had lied when reporting about allegations related to former Prime Minister Edward Heath, with Byline Times being forced to pay compensation and then ultimately deciding to abandon Impress and thus become unregulated.

The site’s owner, Peter Jukes, is a former Labour member who frequently engages in online trolling and attacks against people whom he disagrees with politically, using Byline Times to produce propaganda, often proven to contain demonstrably false information, to attack his critics.
Mr Jukes himself has been accused of sexual impropriety, with some of the allegations first being published by Politicalite. In retaliation, two years ago Jukes launched a crowdfunder, claiming that he would use all of the money raised to sue Politicalite and anyone involved in publishing the story containing the allegations made against him – including the editor of VoteWatch, yours truly.
Jukes raised over £60,000 from his followers on social media. To date, however, none of the people whom Jukes mentioned in his crowdfunder have ever been sued. Neither Jukes nor the law firm he uses (with one of the senior lawyers at the company being his close friend) have filed any legal action against any of the individuals. The Byline Times and Peter Jukes have also failed to make donors aware of this, have not disclosed what the money was spent on, and have not offered any of the donors refunds.

This is not the only example of Peter Jukes, a well-known conspiracy theorist, using his website and political sensationalism on social media to mislead donors – as VoteWatch will reveal in an exclusive next week.
Furthermore, the Byline Times has accepted large donations from millionaires linked to antisemitism and from anti-west conspiracy theorists based in China.

Recently, one of the Byline Times’ most well-known journalists was found to have been publishing demonstrably false information to demonise Israel, before being slammed for tweeting racist and xenophobic comments about Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
The Byline Times appears not to employ any fact-checkers and has been caught printing false information throughout its existence – always targeting Conservatives and the right-wing with demonstrably lies. Recent examples include a fake ‘investigation’ relating to Priti Patel.
In fact, Jukes and the Byline Times have been embroiled in a string of scandals including links to antisemites, and the publication of fake news, including repeatedly printing disinformation about a ‘pedophile ring’ that was later proven to not have existed.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Byline expose

Part 5

https://bylinetimes.com/2023/07/28/m...s-and-the-bbc/


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Part 67 coming soon!!!
Give us more money!

[The Slim Reaper]

Dan Wooton is yet to deny any of the charges, or deny that he and Martin Branning are the same people. Let's see if he is willing to do what any of us on here would do if we were falsely hit with these claims - deny them. The only reason he wouldn't is because his lawyers have very clearly told him not to. But who knows what the reason for that is...

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by jet

Part 67 coming soon!!!
Give us more money!

Who knew that the Byline times would expose themselves (sorry Dan), to financial ruin, in order to make money. that's some con they're running.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by jet

Seen this posted elsewhere taken from a site called ‘Votewatch’, which the poster credits as a reputable source….

IS THE BYLINE TIMES A CREDIBLE AND RELIABLE NEWS OUTLET?

The short answer is no. The Byline Times has a history of printing false information and politically-motivated smear pieces.
More concerningly, the Byline Times has been successfully sued multiple times, including on one occasion for publishing false information relating to sexual abuse allegations.
In 2017, regulatory body Impress, of which the Byline Times was a member, ruled that its journalists had lied when reporting about allegations related to former Prime Minister Edward Heath, with Byline Times being forced to pay compensation and then ultimately deciding to abandon Impress and thus become unregulated.

The site’s owner, Peter Jukes, is a former Labour member who frequently engages in online trolling and attacks against people whom he disagrees with politically, using Byline Times to produce propaganda, often proven to contain demonstrably false information, to attack his critics.
Mr Jukes himself has been accused of sexual impropriety, with some of the allegations first being published by Politicalite. In retaliation, two years ago Jukes launched a crowdfunder, claiming that he would use all of the money raised to sue Politicalite and anyone involved in publishing the story containing the allegations made against him – including the editor of VoteWatch, yours truly.
Jukes raised over £60,000 from his followers on social media. To date, however, none of the people whom Jukes mentioned in his crowdfunder have ever been sued. Neither Jukes nor the law firm he uses (with one of the senior lawyers at the company being his close friend) have filed any legal action against any of the individuals. The Byline Times and Peter Jukes have also failed to make donors aware of this, have not disclosed what the money was spent on, and have not offered any of the donors refunds.

This is not the only example of Peter Jukes, a well-known conspiracy theorist, using his website and political sensationalism on social media to mislead donors – as VoteWatch will reveal in an exclusive next week.
Furthermore, the Byline Times has accepted large donations from millionaires linked to antisemitism and from anti-west conspiracy theorists based in China.

Recently, one of the Byline Times’ most well-known journalists was found to have been publishing demonstrably false information to demonise Israel, before being slammed for tweeting racist and xenophobic comments about Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.
The Byline Times appears not to employ any fact-checkers and has been caught printing false information throughout its existence – always targeting Conservatives and the right-wing with demonstrably lies. Recent examples include a fake ‘investigation’ relating to Priti Patel.
In fact, Jukes and the Byline Times have been embroiled in a string of scandals including links to antisemites, and the publication of fake news, including repeatedly printing disinformation about a ‘pedophile ring’ that was later proven to not have existed.

Post the link, my brother.