[Crimson Dynamo]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

The Clintons are now at the hearing.

[arista]

She stated she was not aware of wrongdoing.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ding-Bill.html


Tomorrow is Bill Clinton

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by arista

She stated she was not aware of wrongdoing.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ding-Bill.html


Tomorrow is Bill Clinton

Never liked Hilary Clinton for some reason

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

They're (probably, allegedly) accepting other kinds of ... minor ... gift, and the cash loans and gifts tie them to the brokers in a traceable way, which would implicate them if the brokers were brought down.

I'm still in awe that you're related to Eddie Hapgood.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Never liked Hilary Clinton for some reason

she is vile and crooked

[bots]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

she is vile and crooked

you have just described every politician today

[Glenn.]

She’s the vile and crooked one?

[Vanessa]

Ask her about frazzlledrip.

[GiRTh]

The whole thing spiralled the moment people started dragging in stuff like Pizzagate. It’s been debunked for years, but it still gets thrown around whenever Clinton’s name comes up, even though there’s nothing linking her to Epstein in any official capacity and no record of them ever meeting. That doesn’t stop people from trying to force it into the conversation anyway, because it fits the narrative they want to push.

Meanwhile, the part that actually has some basis in reality gets brushed aside. Melania did move in the same social circles as Epstein and Maxwell back in the day, and that’s where the long‑running rumour about how she first crossed paths with Trump comes from. But that angle never gets the same level of outrage or scrutiny. People demand answers from one direction while pretending the other direction doesn’t exist.

So the whole thing ends up completely lopsided. Instead of sticking to what’s documented, everyone starts shouting about whatever fits their preferred storyline, and the loudest voices are usually the ones pushing the wildest angles. By the end of it, the whole discussion feels less like a hearing and more like a circus.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

The whole thing spiralled the moment people started dragging in stuff like Pizzagate. It’s been debunked for years, but it still gets thrown around whenever Clinton’s name comes up, even though there’s nothing linking her to Epstein in any official capacity and no record of them ever meeting. That doesn’t stop people from trying to force it into the conversation anyway, because it fits the narrative they want to push.

Meanwhile, the part that actually has some basis in reality gets brushed aside. Melania did move in the same social circles as Epstein and Maxwell back in the day, and that’s where the long‑running rumour about how she first crossed paths with Trump comes from. But that angle never gets the same level of outrage or scrutiny. People demand answers from one direction while pretending the other direction doesn’t exist.

So the whole thing ends up completely lopsided. Instead of sticking to what’s documented, everyone starts shouting about whatever fits their preferred storyline, and the loudest voices are usually the ones pushing the wildest angles. By the end of it, the whole discussion feels less like a hearing and more like a circus.

I heard that's what links Meghan and Harry as well, and that is the real reason he was banished to America

[bots]

Pizza gate is a classic case of misdirection. Meanwhile, the real guilty parties carry on as before

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Parmy

I heard that's what links Meghan and Harry as well, and that is the real reason he was banished to America

Seemingly not