[Crimson Dynamo]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

The Clintons are now at the hearing.

[arista]

She stated she was not aware of wrongdoing.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ding-Bill.html


Tomorrow is Bill Clinton

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by arista

She stated she was not aware of wrongdoing.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ding-Bill.html


Tomorrow is Bill Clinton

Never liked Hilary Clinton for some reason

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

They're (probably, allegedly) accepting other kinds of ... minor ... gift, and the cash loans and gifts tie them to the brokers in a traceable way, which would implicate them if the brokers were brought down.

I'm still in awe that you're related to Eddie Hapgood.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Never liked Hilary Clinton for some reason

she is vile and crooked

[bots]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

she is vile and crooked

you have just described every politician today

[Glenn.]

She’s the vile and crooked one?

[Vanessa]

Ask her about frazzlledrip.

[GiRTh]

The whole thing spiralled the moment people started dragging in stuff like Pizzagate. It’s been debunked for years, but it still gets thrown around whenever Clinton’s name comes up, even though there’s nothing linking her to Epstein in any official capacity and no record of them ever meeting. That doesn’t stop people from trying to force it into the conversation anyway, because it fits the narrative they want to push.

Meanwhile, the part that actually has some basis in reality gets brushed aside. Melania did move in the same social circles as Epstein and Maxwell back in the day, and that’s where the long‑running rumour about how she first crossed paths with Trump comes from. But that angle never gets the same level of outrage or scrutiny. People demand answers from one direction while pretending the other direction doesn’t exist.

So the whole thing ends up completely lopsided. Instead of sticking to what’s documented, everyone starts shouting about whatever fits their preferred storyline, and the loudest voices are usually the ones pushing the wildest angles. By the end of it, the whole discussion feels less like a hearing and more like a circus.

[Parmy]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

The whole thing spiralled the moment people started dragging in stuff like Pizzagate. It’s been debunked for years, but it still gets thrown around whenever Clinton’s name comes up, even though there’s nothing linking her to Epstein in any official capacity and no record of them ever meeting. That doesn’t stop people from trying to force it into the conversation anyway, because it fits the narrative they want to push.

Meanwhile, the part that actually has some basis in reality gets brushed aside. Melania did move in the same social circles as Epstein and Maxwell back in the day, and that’s where the long‑running rumour about how she first crossed paths with Trump comes from. But that angle never gets the same level of outrage or scrutiny. People demand answers from one direction while pretending the other direction doesn’t exist.

So the whole thing ends up completely lopsided. Instead of sticking to what’s documented, everyone starts shouting about whatever fits their preferred storyline, and the loudest voices are usually the ones pushing the wildest angles. By the end of it, the whole discussion feels less like a hearing and more like a circus.

I heard that's what links Meghan and Harry as well, and that is the real reason he was banished to America

[bots]

Pizza gate is a classic case of misdirection. Meanwhile, the real guilty parties carry on as before

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Parmy

I heard that's what links Meghan and Harry as well, and that is the real reason he was banished to America

Seemingly not

[Ammi]

Epstein files: Missing FBI documents related to Trump allegations released

Donald Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing in relation to Jeffrey Epstein, and his press secretary said allegations in the newly released files are "baseless".

FBI documents related to sexual abuse allegations against Donald Trump - which were missing from the initial release of the Epstein files - have been posted online by the US justice department.

It comes after American media, including Sky's partner network NBC News, reported on their absence.

The justice department said some missing files brought to its attention had been wrongly labelled as "duplicative" in its spreadsheet, meaning they were not visible to the public, and had corrected the error.

They include summaries and notes from three separate interviews the FBI conducted with a woman who alleged she was sexually assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein, and abused by the now president.

Mr Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing, and he and the White House have said the Epstein files have exonerated him.

Sky News has contacted the White House for comment about the claims in the newly released files.

In an earlier statement on Thursday, the president's press secretary Karoline Leavitt said they are "completely baseless" and "backed by zero credible evidence".

The justice department has previously warned the files include unfounded accusations about the president.


What are the allegations?

The woman, from South Carolina, came forward to law enforcement after Epstein was arrested in 2019.

She alleged the billionaire financier assaulted her on Hilton Head Island, in her home state, when she was 13.

The alleged incident happened in or around 1984, according to a summary of an FBI interview.

The FBI conducted follow-up interviews on four separate dates in 2019: 24 July, 7 August, 20 August, and 16 October.

The dates were revealed as part of a catalogue of evidence against Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's ex-girlfriend and convicted co-conspirator, which was released by the justice department.

But only the FBI's summary of the 24 July interview was initially included in the millions of documents comprising the Epstein files. It does not mention any allegations against Mr Trump.

It is the memos from the other three interviews that have now been published. The woman - whose name is redacted throughout - alleges abuse by Epstein and several associates, including, she claims, Mr Trump.


…full article…

https://news.sky.com/story/epstein-f...eased-13515940