FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | ||
|
|||
Member
|
all housemates are being put in jail for one small step out of line
everyday someones in there i was looking forward to them using the jail but they're using it too much |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Arrrrrgh typos.
I think BB is being too harsh when it comes to chucking people out, but putting them in jail for talking about nominations is a good idea I think. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
zero tolerance ennit. And I assure if Alex or Dennis didn't get chucked out there would be uproar.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I think they need to get harsher to be honest... its quite clear housemates cant resist talking about nominations and the jail isnt working.. either make sure they have no contact while in jail or just introduce the confinement room! or just damn well punish them!
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Viewer Emeritus
|
The jail is a farce!! Privilege removal i.e banning from nominating or putting them up for eviction would be far more effective and much more entertaining than the stupid jail!!!
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No, if they don't like it in jail then all they need to do is stop chatting about nominations, surely they must no what will happen now.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I think the punishments have been fair so far.It lets them know that BB will clamp down on the rule breaking and hopefully will discourage them from repeating these rule breaks in future.
If they carry on with the rule breaks, they punishments can become more severe, for example being banned from nominating. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Indeed it should get harder. Sent to jail and then allowed as many visitors and food given and chats galore.....That's no punishment. They should bring back the cat of nine tails, The rope or the electric chair....Failing that good old fashioned ban from nominating.... ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Viewer Emeritus
|
Dale may well have been right!! BB keeps in who it wants to keep in!!
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
No, they are being just harsh enough. The whole point was Zero Tolerance and Im glad they are using the jail.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Absolutely not.
The theme of the series is Zero Tolerance - no rule-break should go unpunished. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
Viewer Emeritus
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Iconic Symbolic Historic
|
Not harsh enough. The HM's will always talk about nominations so BB should think up harsher punishments.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The jail is not tough enough they should be in a small room no contact with each other whatsoever and wear a ball and chain
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
Hasn't it happened in other series that when you got caught talking about nominations you then weren't allowed to nominate? Or am I imagining that?
I think that is a much harsher punishment then sitting out in the garden for a few hours |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Are you being serious?? They need to get harder!!
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|