FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
Like a fine whiskey
|
In BB 1 and 2 there was never an eviction until the 2nd week, this way you got to know all the h/mates properly before casting votes to evict.
I'm surprised BB have not scrapped this yet as they have lost some memorable h/mates in the first week that would have been very interesting to see develop: BB3: Lynne BB4: Anouska BB6: Mary (the scary witch lady) BB7: Bonnie BB9: Stephanie |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yeh I think they should all of the above housemates we didnt get to know.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Locke.
|
Yeah we should be given time to get to know all the Housemates before we evict one of them.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Feeling DiskInserted💿
|
Yes!
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
poor steph
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
yeah ... give them time to settle so we can decide who we want to chuck .... maybe 3 weeks? ...
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
No, I like having an eviction each week. Also if they did this they'd have to add an extra week and I think it's too long already!
Friday should always have something happening. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
BURLESQUE
|
All of them had to go though in order for the twist to work. Steph had to be up cos they couldn't keep that act up for two weeks, Bonnie had to go cos the Big Brotherhood was full, Shabnam actually got two weeks to be fair, Anouska had to go cos the twist was first impression nominations. So yeah, I'd like to see first week evictions go, but I'd like to see first weeks twists stay even more.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Bonnie wouldn't have lasted.
And Shabnam survived two weeks since Emily was removed the first week. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
I think they should do a shock midweek eviction on about day 11 because then the public know the HM up for eviction a bit better, although I did feel sorry for Steph this year because half of her time in there was pretending to be Mario's gf and she only had about 3 days as herself.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I think they should, 1 week is not long enough to get to know all the housemates.#
and it could save on bringing new housemates in half way through the series |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yeah. It's so stupid because the public get rid of a potentially great housemate purely on first impressions, and most HMs change a lot throughout. Nobody's really how they would be later on in their first week
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
yes
week 2 first eviction please ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
They should be scrapped. You don't get to see what the person nis really like in just a week. I'm forever changing my opinion on housemates, and the first evicted housemate doesn't really get a chance.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Noooooo it makes good tv for the first week, without an eviction it gets well boring
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Yeah, but that's a potentially very good housemate gone.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
yerh i think its a good i dea, but eviction in the first week aint that bad, afterall it kinda gives them the role of the person who had the shortest time in the house ^,^
and if they have more than 13 people in the house, then theyd have to do an eviction in the first week otherwise therd just be too many of them |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Or they could just have a double eviction or something in the second week? I don't know, but i personally think it should be scrapped.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yes. Either that or have the whole house up so we can get rid of the truely dull ones and try to feature everyone as much as possible in the highlight shows.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
When they do the launch night twists it would be better if they climaxed the following Friday (if they can carry them on that long) so there is a live show each Friday. Then evictions start at the end of week 2 but stick them all up in a vote to save to get rid of any radar dodgers.
I prefer it when they all get a chance to bed in so we can get to know what people are really like not all based on first impressions |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
I agree actually. The public make their minds up after a few days for the girls. The girls get judge way before the boys, thats why a female is always evicted first.
Hopefully, by Week 2 we will know the housemates more than just after 1 week. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Yes they really should.
You need to know the housemates first for a full week, then we should be able to vote them out, otherwise we will still act irrational when it comes to dialling the phone. Like Anouska was the star of BB4, but people immediately phoned in their thousands to get her out on the first night and first few days, but afterwards, there was a U turn, but it was all too late. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
yeah they should because then we dont really see much of them and dont really have that much of an opinion on them yet and could be evicting a good character!! and alll the housemate that come in like half way through get at least 2 weeks there !
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||
|
|||
Junior Member
|
No they should do 1st week eviction as halfway through the 2nd week so day10/11 ish imo.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|