[davina1973]

what if the general public became bb for bb10, we would defo get want the public want , let us decided tasks ,who nominates, let us be bb in the dairy room and talk to the housemates direct !!!

[Marsh.]

That is officially one of the worst ideas ever!

[Brekkie]

Even worse than BB8!

The public can barely be trusted to evict the right people, never mind anything else!

[amby]

NO WAY!!!

[30stone]

Naw though i think there should be minimum of 4 people up.... Its annoying with just 2...

Gives us a better chance to get the worse ones out.

[Brekkie]

Head to Head evictions are the best. The more people that are up, the more likely your favourite is to be up, and the more likely they'll get evicted.

[Tom]

I don't like head to head evictions, they're almost always really predictable.

[30stone]

Yeah but some series you have someone in that you dont want to be in and nobody really does but they last longer than other people who should have stayed longer. Imo Stuart bb9 and mo bb9. Stuart was getting loads of fans but just barely lost to Rachel who had so many fans she won, he'd of stayed if more were up.

Having 4 + would be the best.

[Brekkie]

Originally posted by Tom
I don't like head to head evictions, they're almost always really predictable.

So are those with 3 or more up - usually when everyone is up it's just as predictable who is going.

It all comes back to getting the HMs right - then predictable or not, the head to heads work as you either get two people from each side of the house up for eviction, or two friends going head to head.

[no1bigbrofan]

Not a good idea at all!

[Magic]

Could be fun if something abit similar to this ran for a week, where we had a strong influence.

But no longer, and not total control.