[Brad*]

Do you want a back to basics series like BB1 or BB2 or would you like a series with a format like from BB7, BB8 and BB9?

Back to basics (rough guidelines):

- 10/11 HM's in on launch with 1 latecomer.

- 60 - 70 day series.

- Only 1 sister show with only 1 presenter.

- Unique tasks and twists.

- Basic house layout with no secret rooms.

New (rough guidelines):

- 12 - 16 HM's in on launch with 2 - 7 latecomers.

- 90 - 100 day series.

- 2/3 sister shows with 3/4 presenters.

- Mostly repeated tasks from previous series'.

- Complicated house layout with 2/3 secret rooms.

Personally, I prefer the back to basics idea. It could do BB10 wonders and not bore people out of their brains. Yes, I do LOVE BB but I wouldn't mind having a shorter series for once. Viewers might well watch the whole thing instead of giving up by week 7/8. What do you think?

[Brekkie]

Back to basics as in back to doing things as they were in the early days isn't going to really work unless it's marketed really, really well - and has enough new interpretation so although the ethos is back to basics, the show isn't completely stripped back.

[Tom]

The audience has changed too much, it just won't work anymore. Plus the show needs to move forward, not backwards.

[Marsh.]

If it's new it wouldn't have repeated tasks and not necessarily 3/4 presenters.

[Harry!]

Davina is already doing Big Mouth this year and George should do BBLB. No other shows btw.