| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
24-06-2009, 07:59 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Just wondered. Davina said earlier on BBLB that the HM8s have 90 secs to nominate and explain that nomination. Does that mean 90 secs per HM or 45 secs per HM? They are all going to be flummoxed when BB announces to them indivually that they have 90 to give name and reasons starting now.
|
||
|
 Reply With Quote
|
|
24-06-2009, 08:01 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Good poitn, you're sharp today!
90 secs to nominate I presume! |
||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
|
24-06-2009, 08:06 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
90 seconds i think
|
||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
|
24-06-2009, 09:48 PM
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
So it must be 90 secs for both HMs, this will clearly confuse some of them unless they practise. Now that BB has informed them of what is going to happen and length of time they have has ruined it. BB - Why couldn't you just call them into the DR and tell them they had 90 secs, have to name the person and give reasons why, this way they they will be confused and mix their words up but now they will have time to thinkabout it.
|
||
|
|
Reply With Quote
|
| Reply |
|
|
90 secs per HM or 45 secs per HM?
Linear Mode
