[ElProximo]

Everyone 'shocked' over the 'schocker nomination' and very few have discussed why it happened in the first place:
Marcus and Bea HOWEVER... as a punishment for Marcus and Siavash we will put all HMs up for eviction.
Arguably, this could be a punishment for Siavash who would not otherwise be nommed,
but,
was another 'save' for Marcus. Not only was it not a punishment it gave him another great possibility to survive!
No wonder Marcus was laughing at the expense of others.. why wouldn't he love it!?

If the 'punishment' was that Marcus and Siavash face the wrath of all the others not originally nominated then that was pretty weak.
Rodrigo telling off Marcus for 12 seconds?

No no.. I think we all got entirely carried away into 'who to save' that we have not solved this.
Where is the punishment yet?

Here is my guess about the yet to be delivered punishment for Marcus and Siavash:
Friday Night. Live.
The nominations can now be revealed and the nth member to be voted for eviction is... .. RODRIGO!!
[Pause]
However... ...There are two HMs who have informed Big Brother they no longer wish to participate or might rather leave the Big Brother house.
(and those actions are why Rodrigo is being evicted),
SO...
...Big Brother will now give either of those HMs the ability to exchange their HM Status for Rodrigos.
They have 2 Minutes to decide if they will replace Rodrigo and leave as they claimed they desired,
or,
Stay HMs and allow Rodrigo to be evicted?
2 Minutes Marcus and Siavash?????

Potential:
If Marcus takes his place it can actually turn into a surprising vindication for Marcus. People will see he was to blame and was who would be leaving anyways,
BUT,
will give him credit for actually 'walking the talk' and for once really living up to his 'knights honour' claims and doing the right thing.
or,
If Siavash volunteers it will also redeem him as the one who paid for his wrongdoing and made up his mind to simply leave if he said he wanted to.

There simply has to be something else because unless Marcus (or maybe Siavash) is evicted then we go back to a house where Marcus (who would have gone) has, effectively BENEFITED from rule breaking at the expense of someone else.
No.
That cannot be the 'punishment'.

What say you?
Where is Marcus and Siavashs upcoming punishment after all?

[LoadOfDross]

Although I do agree that this was a **** punishment, and a way for BB to keep in the trouble makers. I doubt any of this will happen.

[BB22]

Highly unlikely, I would say.

[bigbrother10uk]

big brother has realized that if Marcus or Bea leaves, the show is going suck.

[ElProximo]

Originally posted by LoadOfDross
Although I do agree that this was a **** punishment, and a way for BB to keep in the trouble makers. I doubt any of this will happen.

Part of me knows you are right about that but the last remaining hope in me is trying to come up with some sort of legitimate sense beyond 'keeping Marcus in' and making money off vote schemes.

[BigBrotherfan4ever]

Going off topic a bit (sorry) i but did you notice that Siavash apologised to everyone cause he had cause everyone to be up for nom, where as Marcus & Freddie just laughed.

I dont know what they will do but they should be punished.

[HELLIWONTGO]

Whilst I admire the op for his/her dedication to the program, I think you take it far to seriously, certainly moreso than the muppets that make and produce BB!

[charmingmissc]

so none of the others have said they want to go home?

siavash refused to nominate not marcus.

rodders just had a hissy fit because marcus was laughing,

sparking off one of the highlights of the show.

team viper are trying to blame team cool as .... for

everything they can.

that arument had to happen, it has been simmering for ages.

shake the tree and watch the bad apples fall.

[ElProximo]

Originally posted by BigBrotherfan4ever
Going off topic a bit (sorry) i but did you notice that Siavash apologised to everyone cause he had cause everyone to be up for nom, where as Marcus & Freddie just laughed.

I dont know what they will do but they should be punished.

Put aside whether anyone is 'for or against' Marcus and suppose it was anyone.
They were to be properly nominated and for the sake of argument have a 50-50 chance of leaving.
(Marcus was surely a 70%+ chance but even still)
so,
What they have done is deliberately broken rules and consequently (not that they knew) but as a result just gone from a 50% chance of leaving to a 10% chance of leaving.
No wonder Marcus couldn't stop laughing.. ..I mean he just won big!!
It is no wonder he didn't slap everyone upside the head ala Benny Hill, fart in the room and then go dance around the yard taunting "you dumb ****s.. you dumb ****s" and kiss his biceps.
He just won!
He all but got another free week and a step closer BY rule-breaking.
I won't be surprised if he does stand at the exit pointing and laughing the evictee!
Why not?
What are they going to do about it - give him another weeks immunity??

I still have a hard time believing that Big Brother UK has just lowered itself to the level BBUSA8 did with their 'Marcus' and just blatantly keep them in.
To the point of all but making up 'immunity' prizes.
Now,
That is one thing but the UK Version of Evel Dick isn't so easy when you consider people here actually PAY money to evict.
I dunno.. quite seriously I am surprised there hasn't been a huge number of official complaints sent in about this?

I still want to believe some sort of twist is coming. There has to be an actual punishment.
I think my idea would be greatness and can you just imagine if neither of them took it??
Marcus won't go in the persons place (which was actually his place) and they are evicted and he stays and laughs it up more?