[Nikkos]

It should be to vote out. It's not fair on new housemates who haven't had the same time to establish hardcore fans. Fair enough if we wanted a new housemate OUT but have you noticed the three favourites to go are the three new housemates.

[Brad.]

'sham' is an over-exaggeration. If the newbies were really likeable, we would like them. they're not though, so many of us dont.

[camertone]

yes, it is a sham, a fix, simply for the fact that everyone is up because of only 2 housemates' mistakes, and "vote to save" means it will keep bea in the house and evict lisa, david, or hira, it is a fix from bb.

[Jayson]

It isn't a bloody fix or sham!

A fix is when the outcome is pre-determined by Channel4 and no matter who the public decide to vote out/save that person will be evicted.

To clarify, NOT A FIX, just swaying the voters.

[Discogill]

it is a sham freddie is signaling out to his ritch mates to vote out certain people he has the biggist game plan ever why o why can everone see this

[ANTCOLONY]

The OP has a point
why was it a vote to save anyway?

[Mutteroo]

OMG! I can't believe the silly comments being posted here. Like being back at school.
BB cab change the rules at any time plus if it's such a fix then why was Lisa's rulebreaking at the beginning ignored? Why was lisa's behaviour last night completely ignored?
Maybe every housemate has been cut some flack? Remember it's only a gameshow.

[ElProximo]

Originally posted by Nikkos
It should be to vote out. It's not fair on new housemates who haven't had the same time to establish hardcore fans. Fair enough if we wanted a new housemate OUT but have you noticed the three favourites to go are the three new housemates.

Oh yes.. it may not be 'illegal' but its a scam, a scheme, a trick and a whole bunch of BS.
It was really just a scheme to try and save Marcus and Bea and instead make it a sort of 'inverted vote' against the new HMs but in a way to haul in the maximum money.

Its almost stupidly simple too.. you can almost hear some money-man in the meetings:
" Right now they pay to evict one HM over another... if you made it so they vote for EVERY HM over one other you make way more money!?!?"

The guy who thought of this scheme is like a hero among execs right now.

[RCW1945]

Because the producers wanted to upset all your conservative minds.
They are successful!

[Maia]

Yes, it was a terrible result. Hira should not have been evicted.

[Big_Kahuna]

naughty BB. I suppose them controlling the show should be a good thing so they make the most out of the show but they messed up tonight. As much as I like Hira, she should be the first to go on the finale, not have an eviction night of her own. She was just starting to get into her own aswell. I'm tired of looking at lisas smelly face

[Jarvio]

It will be a vote to evict again from now on until the final I would have thought... They can't exactly repeat the same twist twice in one series

[BB22]

It is not a trick, it is not a scam and it is not a conspiracy. People are obsessed with such nonsense on this forum. It was just different.

Hira went because that is now people chose to cast their votes. We just have to accept it and move on to next week.

[King Gizzard]

Big brother just wanted to get hira out tbh

if that was vote to evict lisa was out of there

[poejoe]

To be honest if Marcus would of voted properly this week instead of messing about and if siavash would of voted , chances are lisa would of been up for noms this week and we could of got rid of her!

[EzzaB]

Yer i agree it was a sham

How the hell David survived i dont no
I predicted lisa would stay

IF THEY HAD BOTHERED SHOWIN HIRA!!!!! IN THE 1ST PLACE
She wouldn't have been evicted
Stupid BB tossers

[Libra]

Big Brother isn't to blame for Hira getting shafted in this eviction.

The people to blame are the people who attempted to influence the situation by voting for Lisa just to try to get rid of Bea.

That was so obviously going to happen.

[BB22]

Originally posted by Libra
Big Brother isn't to blame for Hira getting shafted in this eviction.

The people to blame are the people who attempted to influence the situation by voting for Lisa just to try to get rid of Bea.

That was so obviously going to happen.

There is an element of truth to this insofar as the misguided pseudo-Team Nasty bandwagon that has strangely appeared over the last few days probably stopped the rightful eviction of Lisa.

[mahm]

Originally posted by Hewman
Big brother just wanted to get hira out tbh

if that was vote to evict lisa was out of there

Yeah, they wanted to save the controversial characters 'as they add flavour'. Get the fukn rule breakers and two faced **** outs!

[superbad93]

Its not a sham for God's sake it's the PUBLICS VOTES.

If people are annoyed that Hira's gone it's their own fault they should've voted to save her.

[Josy]

Aw give it a rest with the sham crap, Hira went because she got less votes than everyone else, i dont think she should have went but **** happens.

[jegmeister]

Lot of sour grapes on this thread. BB did this to make money - they thought (correctly as it turned out) that people would try to be clever and vote tactically to get someone else out - thereby giving them extra cash .

It worked and what's more Hira went instead of Bea. Absolutely priceless!

[Jayson]

She deserved to be evicted, she was the most boring and she got the least votes.

[hotspur95]

nah it was a total obvious fix

Just like when they boomeranged Charly back into the house a couple of years ago. They bend the rules all the time to manipulate the voting.

Its one of the things that makes me hate BB!

[Nebi]

If you think its fixed just don't ever vote again.

You got 3 choices,

1. Turn off your tv and never watch the show again.
2. Don't vote anymore.
3. Stop crying and accept the fact that its possible that they sometimes cheat.