Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB10 Big Brother 10 from 2009 was won by Sophie Reade.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-08-2009, 10:51 PM #1
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Default Total Fix - here\'s how...

It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.
frigid_slag is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 10:54 PM #2
Benjamin's Avatar
Benjamin Benjamin is offline
Like a fine whiskey
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 66,391

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Sarah
CBB2024: Marisha Wallace


Benjamin Benjamin is offline
Like a fine whiskey
Benjamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wales
Posts: 66,391

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Sarah
CBB2024: Marisha Wallace


Default

Please don't just post random threads which are meaningless, especially in the BB section.
Benjamin is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 10:58 PM #3
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ukturtle
Please don't just post random threads which are meaningless, especially in the BB section.
I pressed return by mistake, or something, i don't know how it happened, anyway have edited it to how it should have been. Sorry
frigid_slag is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 10:58 PM #4
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Default Total Fix - here\'s how...

It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.
frigid_slag is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 10:59 PM #5
BlackOrWhite's Avatar
BlackOrWhite BlackOrWhite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,536
BlackOrWhite BlackOrWhite is offline
Senior Member
BlackOrWhite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,536
Default

BlackOrWhite is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:01 PM #6
Jordan. Jordan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 64,319

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Patsy Palmer
BB2024: Hanah


Jordan. Jordan. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 64,319

Favourites (more):
CBB2025: Patsy Palmer
BB2024: Hanah


Default

Yeah I agree they could of decided after Bea touched him just to get her up but then no one can prove that
Jordan. is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:01 PM #7
Chuckyegg's Avatar
Chuckyegg Chuckyegg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,384
Chuckyegg Chuckyegg is offline
Senior Member
Chuckyegg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,384
Default

Big Brother manipulating people???

Nah!!!
Chuckyegg is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:02 PM #8
Patricia4's Avatar
Patricia4 Patricia4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,797
Patricia4 Patricia4 is offline
Senior Member
Patricia4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 8,797
Default

Im just glad Bea is up
Patricia4 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:03 PM #9
BBmassive BBmassive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,299
BBmassive BBmassive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,299
Default

I agree in some ways ,They SHOULD have put Siavash and Sophie themselves up ,but they CHOSE to do it the way they did ,not fair on the others
BBmassive is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:03 PM #10
Staceee Staceee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 999
Staceee Staceee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 999
Default

Yep.
I made this topic earlier but I think that is what they did
Staceee is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:07 PM #11
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
frigid_slag frigid_slag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by BBmassive
I agree in some ways ,They SHOULD have put Siavash and Sophie themselves up ,but they CHOSE to do it the way they did ,not fair on the others
I honestly think they should have just booted Siavash out. If a housemate had done that a few years back they would have. Siavash has broken the rules loads now. I bet if they told him, he had 3 minutes to give his first nomination or he had to leave through the door on his right as he was going to be ejected, he would have nominated. He no way wants to go and even if a part of him does, not like that he wouldn't. Then told the house what had happened, Sophie wouldn't have not nominated. It p*sses me off the fact that people go into that house, knowing full well what is expected of them, and behave like that. Siavash has really p*ssed me off now.
frigid_slag is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:09 PM #12
GoldHeart's Avatar
GoldHeart GoldHeart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28,488

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Khaled
BB2023: Trish


GoldHeart GoldHeart is offline
Senior Member
GoldHeart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 28,488

Favourites (more):
BB2024: Khaled
BB2023: Trish


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by frigid_slag
It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.
considering the fact that bb let her get awy with alot of sh*t i doubt it was a FIX!!!!! but BB like all of us is PROB SICK OF WATCHING BEA ANYWAY!!!!!!!
GoldHeart is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:11 PM #13
cookiemonster cookiemonster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,528
cookiemonster cookiemonster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,528
Default

think they done the right thing, don't wanna see or hear anymore of Bea's whiny voice.
cookiemonster is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:13 PM #14
LoadOfDross's Avatar
LoadOfDross LoadOfDross is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 254
LoadOfDross LoadOfDross is offline
Senior Member
LoadOfDross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 254
Default

Who cares!!! Bea is up!!! YAY!!!
LoadOfDross is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:15 PM #15
ElProximo's Avatar
ElProximo ElProximo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North
Posts: 3,172

Favourites (more):
BB11: Ben
CBB7: Stephen
ElProximo ElProximo is offline
Senior Member
ElProximo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Great White North
Posts: 3,172

Favourites (more):
BB11: Ben
CBB7: Stephen
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by frigid_slag
It could have been engineered to make it that bea was not up and other people who had 2 noms beofre hand were. however, they wanted to make sure Bea was up so they fixed it to be so...


They didn't have to decide the way Siavash and Sophie were going to nominate people, until half and hour of so later or whenever they felt like it, which could have been after Siavash was touched by Bea etc, then just said it in the highlights show whenever the liked. For example, they could have decided, even though Bea touched siavash, that it was the first person siavash spoke to instead of first person he touched, then it would have been rodrigo and sophie, then an hour later or whatever, told siavash that was how he nominated. We could never prove otherwise, same with Sophie.

See actually this was very unfair the more i think about it. I mean for example, if BB put up on their site the day before noms, "if any of the housemates choose not to nominate, it will be the first 2 people each of them say the word "yes" to". We would all know that it was fair, as they had said before noms. And, if those people happened to be Marcus and David, plus two others and not Bea, then Bea would not be up, as Marcus and Siavsh would get two more noms, bringing their total to 4 each and beas to only 3. As it happens, they changed it both times to make sure it was Marcus, David and Bea.

What do you reckon, was this unfair? I hate Bea, but i don't like to think of big Bro manipulating things like that.

Going by your scenario and now I see exactly how that can be fixed to have gone any way they liked.

People who want Bea out and want to save Marcus are acting as if this is nothing and who should care,
but,
They could have just as easily 'retro-fitted' the rule to be "Whoever said Yes',
or
"whoever Siavash initiated words with"
or
"The first two names Siavash said"
and,
Just as easily had it so that Marcus and David would be up alone or at least so that Bea was NOT nominated.

IF they 'retro-fitted' a scenario that saved Bea then I wonder if there wouldn't be outraged topics, cries of 'foul', calls to OfCom and Petitions all over the place here?

The most dangerous thinking in the world?
The type of mentality that sees genocide even?
Its the thinking that says "Well.. so what.. it doesn't matter because it affected the person we all hate and who deserves it anyways!"
Right. Then eventually it happens to YOU.
ElProximo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:18 PM #16
BBmassive BBmassive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,299
BBmassive BBmassive is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,299
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by frigid_slag
Quote:
Originally posted by BBmassive
I agree in some ways ,They SHOULD have put Siavash and Sophie themselves up ,but they CHOSE to do it the way they did ,not fair on the others
I honestly think they should have just booted Siavash out. If a housemate had done that a few years back they would have. Siavash has broken the rules loads now. I bet if they told him, he had 3 minutes to give his first nomination or he had to leave through the door on his right as he was going to be ejected, he would have nominated. He no way wants to go and even if a part of him does, not like that he wouldn't. Then told the house what had happened, Sophie wouldn't have not nominated. It p*sses me off the fact that people go into that house, knowing full well what is expected of them, and behave like that. Siavash has really p*ssed me off now.
Agree 100% ,he should have been removed last time he didi it ,and the ONLY reason he is doing it is to save his own scrawny neck ,open the door ,no interview ,OUT
BBmassive is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:21 PM #17
ILoveFreddie ILoveFreddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: West London
Posts: 401
ILoveFreddie ILoveFreddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: West London
Posts: 401
Default

I agree with OP but I don't care because it means Bea is up.

on BBLB George said it was the first people Siavash came in to contact with, and then it changed...
ILoveFreddie is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:28 PM #18
dogfacetowin dogfacetowin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ireland
Posts: 135
dogfacetowin dogfacetowin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ireland
Posts: 135
Default

spot on
dogfacetowin is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:35 PM #19
santaa santaa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 801
santaa santaa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 801
Default

I agree its a fix but what can be done about it. BB team needs an overhaul or the programme is sunk for the future
santaa is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:38 PM #20
Jords's Avatar
Jords Jords is offline
Focus
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambs/Lincs
Posts: 48,859

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
DOI 2018: Kem Cetinay


Jords Jords is offline
Focus
Jords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambs/Lincs
Posts: 48,859

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
DOI 2018: Kem Cetinay


Default

No way is it a fix, god you lot are bores!

BB trys to do a twist and yall yell FIX!

Jords is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:40 PM #21
Stankleberry's Avatar
Stankleberry Stankleberry is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 289
Stankleberry Stankleberry is offline
Senior Member
Stankleberry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 289
Default

It is a game show. The whole thing is fixed other than the people's voting. If it weren't, it would be far less interesting.
Stankleberry is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:40 PM #22
Jords's Avatar
Jords Jords is offline
Focus
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambs/Lincs
Posts: 48,859

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
DOI 2018: Kem Cetinay


Jords Jords is offline
Focus
Jords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Cambs/Lincs
Posts: 48,859

Favourites (more):
CBB21: Ann Widdecombe
DOI 2018: Kem Cetinay


Default

Altho in some cases it is a fix, but not this one.

Examples:
Vote to evict changed to vote to save > to get lovely Hira out

Able to discuss noms > bigger group can split up the smaller group - Freddie & Marcus up > Freddie, Marcus, Siavash were a trio
Jords is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:46 PM #23
Kore Kore is offline
WAHEY
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: RCT Valley, UK
Posts: 10,649

Favourites:
BB12: Jay
BB11: John James


Kore Kore is offline
WAHEY
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: RCT Valley, UK
Posts: 10,649

Favourites:
BB12: Jay
BB11: John James


Default

not a fix! Bea deserved to go up!

GET HER OUT!!
Kore is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 11:51 PM #24
Jezzy's Avatar
Jezzy Jezzy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Inglaterra
Posts: 1,493

Favourites (more):
CBB 13: Dappy
BBUSA15: McCrae
Jezzy Jezzy is offline
Senior Member
Jezzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Inglaterra
Posts: 1,493

Favourites (more):
CBB 13: Dappy
BBUSA15: McCrae
Default

Was totally fixed BECAUSE Bea was to go up.

Cmon. Should it have been Sophie / Siavash for rule-breaking?
Jezzy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 12:05 AM #25
SurferJay's Avatar
SurferJay SurferJay is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 923
SurferJay SurferJay is offline
Senior Member
SurferJay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 923
Default

she would have been up anyway as she already had 3 nom's.

the extra 2 didnt make a difference
SurferJay is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
bea, fix, here's, total


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts