[*mazedsalv**]

Siavash said that he really disliked Davina. He said in the first HL show showing the HMs entering, I remember watching it on Live Feed and on the HLs.

Do you think why Davina was hard on him and so was BB?

So i guess he had to adore Davina to get a good edit then!

[Vicky.]

I think it was something to do with that.

Also the fact that he refused to nominate so many times, though that is as much their fault as his, since they never 'punished' him for it in the first place did they? If they did, it wouldnt have gone on for so long.

[GypsyGoth]

[rquote=2555189&tid=147196&author=VickyJ]I think it was something to do with that.

Also the fact that he refused to nominate so many times, though that is as much their fault as his, since they never 'punished' him for it in the first place did they? If they did, it wouldnt have gone on for so long.[/rquote]

I agree the whole not nominating seemed to really anger Davina.

It also showed that BB was pretty powerless to make him do what they wanted.

[keenly]

he was a game playing fake *****

BOTTOM LINE!!!!!!!!!!!1

[keep-marcus-in]

[rquote=2555385&tid=147196&author=keenly]he was a game playing fake *****

BOTTOM LINE!!!!!!!!!!!1[/rquote]
It was only a game show i think someones took it too the heart.

[setanta]

It's fairly obvious and understandable that the production team would have a big problem with this guy, which goes beyond just the mere not nominating bull. Lol, I said mere there.... far from a small matter anyway.

[MassiveTruck]

No

The Producers base everything on focus groups they have. They talk to them about their feelings about the show.

So logically, Siavash was a controversial housemate and therefore there was a lot you could fashion out of him - not in a fun way like say Rodrigo and is latin temper and the queen thing, Lisa sitting around and drinking tea, David and his fashion and such but the more controversial things he did.

He basically did it for whatever reason it was (without giving my opinions) but the more extreme you are - the bigger the response.

You get what you give.

[MassiveTruck]

[rquote=2555741&tid=147196&author=setanta]It's fairly obvious and understandable that the production team would have a big problem with this guy, which goes beyond just the mere not nominating bull. Lol, I said mere there.... far from a small matter anyway.[/rquote]

He also didn't explain himself either. He was under some delusion that any excuse will do - and I guess in the world of fanaticism, fans will take any excuse but not all the fans.

I am sure that when the producers got the feed back from focus group and researchers, the vast majority were saying "eh?" and "he's bullshitting" and therefore this was to be raised in the interviews.

What else would be the talking point? Well they covered every other area and all the housemates who were asked basically gave a straight forward response.

In Siavash's case he either blamed somebody else for it, changed his story or said something utterly vague so basically - since this carried on into the interviews, the only viable response was... Whatever.

[Shasown]

[rquote=2555798&tid=147196&author=MassiveTruck][
He also didn't explain himself either. He was under some delusion that any excuse will do - and I guess in the world of fanaticism, fans will take any excuse but not all the fans.

In Siavash's case he either blamed somebody else for it, changed his story or said something utterly vague so basically - since this carried on into the interviews, the only viable response was... Whatever.[/rquote]

Yeah, initially it was coz of his guilt, then it was he didnt want to play the game, then it was I have always said we should all be up etc etc. Consistency would have been better.