[Shasown]

[rquote=2558728&tid=146645&author=RCW1945]" IMO, at least to some extent and in some cases. "
That's getting better.
Of course you are entitled to your opinion even if it is founded on nothing but wild generalisations and backed by no concrete facts.
The problem with your first post was that you stated several "facts" with no evidence at all. Did you read this long thread which is all about the lack of real data?[/rquote]

read it, he started it.

[RCW1945]

It has gone on so long Shasown, that you almost persuaded me that I did start it!

It is a little known fact that last year the Welsh assembly passed an act giving each grandfather resident in Wales 10 free BB votes and for obvious reasons most of them voted for Rachel.
A similar bill was presented to the Scottish parliament but they rejected it as too costly.

[RCW1945]

elphindos
"could potentially" and "could well" are not usually used to presage hard facts.
They are used to present suppositions. Your suppositions, which are not facts.

[Shasown]

[rquote=2558769&tid=146645&author=elphindos]

They don't allow multiple voting in elections for a reason. [/rquote]

Yeah also I Know you are aware of this elphindos but they dont allow multiple accounts on here, especially when the reason is to get round bans

[RCW1945]

It is pure semantics to claim that "could happen" is a fact in any reasonable meaning of the word. A fact would be the claim that it did happen and evidence that it indeed had happened.
As to your point about multiplevoting, I have no view on that, it was not a significant part of your first post and is not the subject of this thread.