Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB4 Cameron, Ray, Scott, Jon Tickle, Nush and the others from Big Brother 4 in 2003.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 17-06-2003, 07:46 PM #1
BusyBee BusyBee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bristol
Posts: 4,742


BusyBee BusyBee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bristol
Posts: 4,742


Default WAS BIG BROTHER TOO HARD ON THE NOMINATORS

Big Brother is at last getting tough with the housemates. He was not having any namby pamby reasons for nominations - gone are the days of "I get on with others in the house better" being acceptable.

Saying that though there were a few weak reasons particularly Nush and Tania's for voting for Cameron.

What will they be like when they get down to the last 5 or 6 if they are finding it difficult now. We shall see.
BusyBee is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003, 07:54 PM #2
kaphc kaphc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 2,224
kaphc kaphc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 2,224
Default

I'm guessing you just watched the nominations uncut program on E4. Unfortunately I missed this and can't see that it's repeated anywhere on E4. So I'll only see the editted version on the 10pm program tonight.

Personally I like Steph's nominations - she always seems to give honest and geniune reasons. I also like Jon's as they are very logical and he bases it on the last 7 days in the house.

I dislike Gos and Nush when they nominate as they give such soppy reasons. I always end up wondering why they are really nominating the person rather than the reason they give.

kaphc is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003, 07:57 PM #3
Amy Amy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 11,503


Amy Amy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 11,503


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by kaphc
Personally I like Steph's nominations - she always seems to give honest and geniune reasons. I also like Jon's as they are very logical and he bases it on the last 7 days in the house.

I dislike Gos and Nush when they nominate as they give such soppy reasons. I always end up wondering why they are really nominating the person rather than the reason they give.
I agree with you there I hate soppy reasons for nominating people! I also think Jon's reasons are probably the best I really don't think bb was that hard on them at all
Amy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003, 08:04 PM #4
BigSister's Avatar
BigSister BigSister is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Accrington- Lancashire
Posts: 33,637

Favourites (more):
CBB18: Ricky Norwood
Strictly 2016: Greg Rutherford


BigSister BigSister is offline
Senior Member
BigSister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Accrington- Lancashire
Posts: 33,637

Favourites (more):
CBB18: Ricky Norwood
Strictly 2016: Greg Rutherford


Default

I also like Jons views and Nush when she did hers I was screaming at the tv lol

But i think they were a bit hard on them
BigSister is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003, 08:05 PM #5
James's Avatar
James James is offline
Jolly good
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 29,147


James James is offline
Jolly good
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 29,147


Default

It's easier to get blood out of a stone than get reasons from Gos or Nush for nominations.
James is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003, 08:16 PM #6
steve_o steve_o is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Newton Abbot Devon
Posts: 1,709
steve_o steve_o is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Newton Abbot Devon
Posts: 1,709
Default

Yep, Nush and Gos's reason's were rubbish. I think it's part of the game plan to be nice at all times. especially Nush!, no one can be that nice, not even Cameron. Something must get on her wick in there. How about Fed's rant on women as an excuse, better than him peeing on the floor, Come on Nush! let em have it!.

steve_o is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003, 08:46 PM #7
Stu xxx Stu xxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 1,756
Stu xxx Stu xxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 1,756
Default

i watched nominations uncut tonight and yes i think Big Brother where being rather harsh i mean Nush's reason for nominating Fed (peeing on the floor and leaving seat up e.t.c) is fair enough - but Big brother still asked for a valid reason x All the producers want is for people to say they hate each other and then show it to the housemates when they get out so Davina can stir her wooden spoon xx
Stu xxx is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003, 07:25 PM #8
bananarama's Avatar
bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
bananarama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


Default

Quote:
All the producers want is for people to say they hate each other and then show it to the housemates when they get out so Davina can stir her wooden spoon xx

You have hit the nail on the head there.
If the housemates don't dislike each other to spit venom then BB shoud face the fact that they are in a bore bore sitution and stop trying to get blood from a stone.

BB have themselves to blame. The constant bias towards Jon and his unjust survival in the house has turned BB4 into a great grandmothers tea party. They will reap as they sow....
bananarama is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003, 07:49 PM #9
James's Avatar
James James is offline
Jolly good
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 29,147


James James is offline
Jolly good
James's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 29,147


Default

If they are so biased to Jon I'm wondering why they've changed the eviction system this week, so that it makes his eviction much more likely.
James is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003, 08:14 PM #10
Stu xxx Stu xxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 1,756
Stu xxx Stu xxx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: LONDON
Posts: 1,756
Default

but they couldn't know for sure if he would be up for eviction xxx
Stu xxx is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 20-06-2003, 06:02 PM #11
bananarama's Avatar
bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


bananarama bananarama is offline
Senior Member
bananarama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 7,438


Default

Quote:
If they are so biased to Jon I'm wondering why they've changed the eviction system this week, so that it makes his eviction much more likely.
They have probably realised a bit late in the day that the Jon factor has turned sour on them as the viewer ratings plummet. It's a desperate attempt for them to undo the destructve elements on the general public that a bore is having in the house.

If they fail this TASK there will likely be no BB5

Celebrity BB this year was boring...It has now been axed to be no more.....The writing is on the wall to those who want to keep a classic bore in the BB house.
bananarama is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
big brother, hard, nominators


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts