[Sticks]

So any signs of

• blatent manipulation in favour of a chosen one (Like they did with alex last year)
• What is the track record of incompetance ?
• Lapses in duty of care ?
• Blatant opportunism at the expense of a housemate
• Have they killed the goose that lays the golden eggs ?

would you trust Endemol to run a welk store ?

[miss little glitzee]

your so cynical!!!!

i do agree with most of what you say tho!!!

[BusyBee]

I would trust Endemol to run a p**s up in a brewery.

[James]

Originally posted by Sticks
So any signs of
[list][*]blatent manipulation in favour of a chosen one (Like they did with alex last year)

On Digital Spy they seem to think it's all manipulated in favour of Cameron Stout. Can't see it myself, or even why. Why on earth would they favour him?
And BTW it wasn't Alex who was favoured last year, it was Jade.

[*]Have they killed the goose that lays the golden eggs ?

Yeah with the double eviction they decided that it would be worth getting rid of the housemates (Jon and Fed) that made the show interesting.

[steve_o]

Have they killed the goose that lays the golden eggs ?

No, but I thought they'd killed a few chickens until they turned up today. Now we'll have something interesting to watch when they turn off the cameras from the Housmates for what ever reason.

[AndyJK]

It's difficult for the makers to manipulate any of the remaining house mates as they are equally as dull and zombified as each other. Cameron has probably got an edge due to visiting BBA, but can't be ruled as manipulation as each house mate had the chance to accept the task. Even though his activities out there have no effect in changing my opinion on Cameron as I still think he's boring.

The makers have been incompetent in their selection of this series of house mates and applying a double eviction which saw the loss of Federico and Jon.