FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
CBB9 Celebrity Big Brother 9 on Channel 5, was shown January 2012 and won by Denise Welch. Discuss the series here. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 | |||
|
||||
thankyou sir alex
|
From what I understand around 2000 people have a box and what ever channel they watch it's multiplied by x and that's how we get viewing figures.
What If no one watches bb that owns one of these boxes? Will they class it as no viewing figures even if 400,000 people watched it? I don't get it. Explain please |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
From what I've heard its around 5,000 - although as you say it is extremely likely out of 5000 people no one will watch BB. I've always wondered why they have such a small sample.
Maybe they have demographics so for example, there are a certain amount of people over 65 with a box, certain amount between 16-34, etc so it's likely someone will watch. Basically, I don't know. LOL |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
thankyou sir alex
|
I'm confused. Just like Andrew stone *allegedly
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I think that 10 years ago it was a very reliable way of getting ratings But a wider range of people watch tv nowadays, also since 2007 the range of channels has exploded, the way we watch tv has changed, most of the people i know who watch big brother record it, or sky+ or whatever. so in 2012 I think that it 5000 people is not a big enough sample and in truth, way more than 3.5 million people watched that launch last week. But there's no proof because its extrapolated from such a ridiculously small sample.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |||
|
||||
Skinny Legend
|
coz someone is gonna read all of that omah
![]()
__________________
![]() The scars on my mind are on replay |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I read it lol
I don't understand why they can't get the viewing figures from sky/virgin/bt etc as well. Think figures would be a damn-sight more accurate |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
If a person in one of the sampled houses watches a TV program on sky its recorded as the channel they watch. The mention in the write up is talking about demographic areas. The only way to gain more accurate samplings would be to increase the numbers of households sampled. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
agreed!!!
Last edited by Me. I Am Salman; 12-01-2012 at 04:33 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Oh my god, deja vu. I got into a HUGE argument about this during the last cbb (I think it was)
And I still dont see how a few thousand boxes can give accurate readings ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
|
||||
It's lacroix darling
|
This
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Yeah I know what it says.
I was simply explaining the relevant parts to kisy, who had admitted she read it but didnt understand it. Maybe when you do your usual cut and paste jobbies you could highlight relevant or important sections instead of just pasting verbatim. It could save such confusion and make everyone elses lives a little easier. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
Thats why I referenced the write up you had as usual cut and pasted so helpfully. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() I had copied and pasted a series of extracts from comprehesive articles on the BARB site, to which I arrached a link .... ![]() Your "reference" was, of course, not linked, non-specific and inaccurate : Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Quote:
If you want to play who can pi** the highest, fill your boots old girl. You will be playing with yourself. My ego doesnt need to be stroked!!! I suppose I could have copied and pasted and quoted all the relevant sections from your well researched C&P article(s), explaining each in turn but hey call me Mr Lazy, thought it was simpler just to go down and dirty. Besides any eejit can see I am referring to the comprehensive pasting you made. Last edited by Shasown; 12-01-2012 at 07:24 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Barb is totally unreliable
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | |||
|
||||
Account Vacant
|
Yeah it could be updated and made more reliable and accurate.
Unfortunately it isnt and its the only thing we have thats recognised across the board. So until the broadcasting industry decide to increase its funding significantly, we are stuck with it. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
agree, it's 2012 and the way we measure ratings is so outdated.
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Your wrong.
It could be better if somebody was willing to pump millions into but they arent plus the ratings are mean tested using questionnaires and are actually found to be accurate enough to satisfy people that are willing to spend millions on advertising so i doubt a few whinging bb fans matter. ![]() Last edited by billy123; 12-01-2012 at 09:22 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Its bewildering that massive corporations still base business decisions on information that unreliable in the year 2012 tbh. In no other business would they sample just 5000 people out of a whole nation to find out how well a product was doing.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Reply |
|
|