[iRyan]

Just like how Steph was ****ed over by the twist in BB9 and was evicted first.
And Rachael was ****ed up by the twist in BB11 and was evicted first.
And Victoria was ****ed over by the twist in BB13 and was evicted first.

Poor Gina/Sallie will join them all thanks to BB producers being ****ing idiots once again. Twists that involve ****ing with first week nominations should not be allowed.

[Visage]

Based on the arguments we've seen so far, how do you think the nominations would have gone if BB didn't have the twist?

[armand.kay]

I don't even understand the point of evicting them a week in :/, why do the producers think the public want to evict a housemate so early ://

[Visage]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I don't even understand the point of evicting them a week in :/, why do the producers think the public want to evict a housemate so early ://

Because it generates voting money perhaps?

I would love to have the first week free, but a big part of the show is about nominations and evictions.

[Amy Jade]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

I don't even understand the point of evicting them a week in :/, why do the producers think the public want to evict a housemate so early ://

Didn't it used to be 2 weeks?

[Munchkins]

Steph BB9 was my saddest one

[ThisIsNickkk]

Originally Posted by StupidHoe

Didn't it used to be 2 weeks?

Yep, it was 2 weeks at one point.

If noms were done properly, Gina and Sallie would have been up anyway I think. What has ****ed them over is the Vote to Evict option.

[Jords]

oh well

[LikeABoatOnWater]

This is Big Brother, I personally accepted this factor seasons ago.

[smeagol]

all housemates would of voted those 3 guaranteed. same result whatever you do.even if it was a week later still would be the same outcome.