[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Gusto Brunt

He was perving on the live feed saying to Chloe that she shouldn't be evicted because she has a 'nice ass and legs'.

Chloe looked a bit shocked.

I didn't see live feed, but that doesn't sound like he is out of his depth

[Gusto Brunt]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I didn't see live feed, but that doesn't sound like he is out of his depth

I wonder if his wife was watching.

[sampvt]

Ken isn't as dumb or lost as some think he is. He is simply sitting back and observing where his allies lie. He will slowly come into it as the personalities show themselves. I am waiting till at least tomorrow before I write my predictions. This years group is a hard one to predict because they are pretty much unknown quantities.

[jaxie]

I agree that he looked a little lost and out of his depth but its very early days. Maybe he'll prove to be more interesting as the days pass.

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Im not here for 90% im supporting the housemates who have the balls to be themselves 100%.

What has you supporting him got to do with anything? My post was merely an observation of what i believe is to be his character.

As for supporting housemates who have the 'balls' to be themselves 100%, weren't you in support of Katie Hopkins being in the house? Don't tell me you think she's being genuine.

And one last point, if you think anyone is being 100% themselves in there then you are sadly mistaken, all will play up to the camera at some point, whether it's outright acting a fool or merely pulling a face for the cameras, it's only natural to do so when you are on national TV.

At best you are getting heightened versions of their personalities.

[sampvt]

Originally Posted by Stevep

What has you supporting him got to do with anything? My post was merely an observation of what i believe it to be his character.

As for supporting housemates who have the 'balls' to be themselves 100%, weren't you in support of Katie Hopkins being in the house? Don't tell me you think she's being genuine.

And one last point, if you think anyone is being 100% themselves in there then you are sadly mistaken, all will play up to the camera at some point, whether it's outright acting a fool or merely pulling a face for the cameras, it's only natural to do so when you are on national TV.

At best you are getting heightened versions of their personalities.

OOOOOO get you, lol. Going up against Daniel, you obviously buy into the being 100% yourself scenario and that's an admirable trait to have. Keep your head down though, lol.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by Stevep

What has you supporting him got to do with anything? My post was merely an observation of what i believe is to be his character.

As for supporting housemates who have the 'balls' to be themselves 100%, weren't you in support of Katie Hopkins being in the house? Don't tell me you think she's being genuine.

And one last point, if you think anyone is being 100% themselves in there then you are sadly mistaken, all will play up to the camera at some point, whether it's outright acting a fool or merely pulling a face for the cameras, it's only natural to do so when you are on national TV.

At best you are getting heightened versions of their personalities.

Ok firstly I had had a few vodkas when I wrote this thread so it does come across a bit over the top lol.

I agree with some of the point you're making but im making a thread based on his actions on launch and on live feed so this is merely my opinion that I thought he looked out of his depth in a house of big characters.

Will my opinion change? Probably its very early days but that doesn't mean its to early to make a thread. Shall we all have to wait until atleast day 3 before we make a thread to make absolutely sure we know who these people really are?

No because we all have first impressions.

I do also think people can be themselves 100% and im glad im not so synical to think everyone is playing to the camera.

[Stevep]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Ok firstly I had had a few vodkas when I wrote this thread so it does come across a bit over the top lol.

I agree with some of the point you're making but im making a thread based on his actions on launch and on live feed so this is merely my opinion that I thought he looked out of his depth in a house of big characters.

Will my opinion change? Probably its very early days but that doesn't mean its to early to make a thread. Shall we all have to wait until atleast day 3 before we make a thread to make absolutely sure we know who these people really are?

No because we all have first impressions.

I do also think people can be themselves 100% and im glad im not so synical to think everyone is playing to the camera.

Think we've both misread the intentions of each others posts. The aim of my post wasn't to outright defend Ken Morley against your opinion, my post was quite simply an observation of his character. I neither like or dislike the guy, quite frankly i know nothing about him. I was only pointing out that he gives me the impression that he has a 'don't give a toss' type of a personality, someone that will not be afraid to say what he truly feels. That said, i could be completely wrong.

As for being cynical regarding people not being 100% themselves, i don't believe i am, i'm just pointing out what i believe to be natural behaviour. I'm not saying all people completely act, i'm just saying you won't get anyone being 100% themselves. If i went in that house with the intentions of being myself, i know, at some point there will come a time where i'll make a comment, act a particular way or make an expression that would be for the benefit of the cameras. Some may act significantly more than others, but i'm fairly confident that all put on an act of some shape or form at some point. I think it would be impossible not to when a nation is watching your every move.